IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdh/ebrief/189.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who Loses Most? The Impact of Taxes and Transfers on Retirement Incomes

Author

Listed:
  • Finn Poschmann

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • Alexandre Laurin

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

Low income seniors face extremely heavy tax burdens across Canada, according to a new C.D. Howe Institute report. In “Who Loses Most? The Impact of Taxes and Transfers on Retirement Incomes,” authors Finn Poschmann and Alexandre Laurin show that seniors can be hit hard by taxes and benefit clawbacks in retirement.

Suggested Citation

  • Finn Poschmann & Alexandre Laurin, 2014. "Who Loses Most? The Impact of Taxes and Transfers on Retirement Incomes," e-briefs 189, C.D. Howe Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/who-loses-most-impact-taxes-and-transfers-retirement-incomes
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Laurin & Kevin Milligan & Tammy Schirle, 2012. "Comparing Nest Eggs: How CPP Reform Affects Retirement Choices," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 352, May.
    2. Kevin Milligan & Tammy Schirle, 2008. "Improving the Labour Market Incentives of Canada's Public Pensions," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 34(3), pages 281-304, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garon, Jean-Denis & Paquet, Alain, 2017. "Les enjeux d'efficience et la fiscalité," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 93(3), pages 297-337, Septembre.
    2. Huang, Huaxiong & Milevsky, Moshe A., 2016. "Longevity risk and retirement income tax efficiency: A location spending rate puzzle," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 50-62.
    3. Colin Busby & Jonathan Pedde, 2014. "Should Public Drug Plans be Based on Age or Income?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 417, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kevin Milligan & Tammy Schirle, 2018. "Retirement Incentives and Canada’s Social Security Programs," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Reforms and Retirement Incentives, pages 79-107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Bev Dahlby & Kevin Milligan, 2017. "From theory to practice: Canadian economists’ contributions to public finance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1324-1347, December.
    3. Alexandre Laurin & Kevin Milligan & Tammy Schirle, 2012. "Comparing Nest Eggs: How CPP Reform Affects Retirement Choices," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 352, May.
    4. Alexandre Laurin & Finn Poschmann & William B.P. Robson, 2011. "When Striking an Awkward Balance Means Striking Out: Budget 2011," e-briefs 112, C.D. Howe Institute.
    5. Kevin Milligan & Tammy Schirle, 2017. "Health Capacity to Work at Older Ages: Evidence from Canada," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: The Capacity to Work at Older Ages, pages 59-83, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Robson, William, 2006. "Accounting for and Thinking about Social Security Liabilities in Canada," Discussion Paper 285, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    7. Colin Busby & William B.P. Robson & Pierre-Marcel Desjardins, 2009. "Stress Test: Demographic Pressures and Policy Options in Atlantic Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 120, November.
    8. Ross Finnie & David Gray & Yan Zhang, 2013. "Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) Status Amongst the Retired Population: An Analysis of the Incidence," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(s1), pages 65-80, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fiscal Policy and Tax Competitiveness; Retirement; Seniors;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:ebrief:189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.