IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cbt/econwp/25-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Generative AI on Productivity: Results of an Early Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This paper uses meta-analysis to summarize the literature that analyses the impact of generative AI on productivity. While we find substantial heterogeneity across studies, our preferred estimate suggests that on average, across a wide range of tasks, sectors, study methods and productivity measures, the use of GenAI tools increases productivity by 17 %. We further find some evidence that experimental studies show a higher association between GenAI use and productivity than quasi-experimental studies, and weak evidence that the size of the impact of GenAI tools is bigger for quantitative than for qualitative measures of productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Coupé & Weilun Wu, 2025. "The Impact of Generative AI on Productivity: Results of an Early Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 25/09, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:25/09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.canterbury.ac.nz/cbt/econwp/2509.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Generative Artificial Intelligence; Productivity; Meta-Analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbt:econwp:25/09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Albert Yee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decannz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.