IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/car/ciorup/89-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Price Uncertainty, The Competitive Firm and the Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk

Author

Abstract

This paper undertakes an analysis of the competitive firm facing output price uncertainty based on Yaari's dual theory of choice under risk. The axiomatic foundation of Yaari's non-expected utility approach permits the formulation of a preference functional which is linear in profit but non-linear in distribution. Yaari's approach allows seperation of the firm's attitude towards risk from its attitude towards wealth and is consistent with experimental evidence on decision-making under uncertainty. In Yaar's dual theory the linearity in profit of the preference funcional stems from a constant marginal utility of wealth and is compatible with either risk aversion or risk inclination. This appealing feature of the dual theory allows us (1) to obtain a characterization of output and input decisions of firms which , unlike the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory of the firm, is in comformity with the main results of the theory of the firm under certainty; (2) to find intuitive comparative statistics effects of increases in risk and risk aversion; (3) to define the profit function for a firm with dual theoretic preferences and show how Hotelling's lemma can be applied to find the firm's output supply and input demand functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny Demers & Michel Demers, 1989. "Price Uncertainty, The Competitive Firm and the Dual Theory of Choice Under Risk," Carleton Industrial Organization Research Unit (CIORU) 89-09, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:car:ciorup:89-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schankerman, Mark & Nadiri, M. Ishaq, 1986. "A test of static equilibrium models and rates of return to quasi-fixed factors, with an application to the Bell system," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-2), pages 97-118.
    2. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters,in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
    4. Richard Levin & Peter C. Reiss, 1984. "Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure," NBER Chapters,in: R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pages 175-208 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Spence, Michael, 1984. "Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 101-121, January.
    6. Evenson, Robert E & Kislev, Yoav, 1973. "Research and Productivity in Wheat and Maize," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(6), pages 1309-1329, Nov.-Dec..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Louis ARCAND, 2006. "Pessimism, Optimism and Credit Rationing," Working Papers 200620, CERDI.
    2. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2006. "Les nouveaux modèles de décision dans le risque et l’incertain : quel apport ?
      [The new models of decision under risk or uncertainty : What approach?]
      ," MPRA Paper 25442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Volij, Oscar & Winter, Eyal, 2002. "On risk aversion and bargaining outcomes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 120-140, October.
    4. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2008. "Les nouveaux modèles de décision dans le risque et l’incertain : quel apport ?
      [The new models of decision under risk or uncertainty: What approach?]
      ," MPRA Paper 83347, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2008.
    5. Kolstad, Charles D. & Kelly, David L. & Mitchell, Glenn, 1999. "Adjustment Costs from Environmental Change Induced by Incomplete Information and Learning," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt9mx119gc, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    6. Hadar, Josef & Seo, Tae Kun, 1995. "Asset diversification in Yaari's dual theory," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1171-1180, June.
    7. Schmidt, Ulrich & Zank, Horst, 2009. "A simple model of cumulative prospect theory," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3-4), pages 308-319, March.
    8. Bernhard Arnold & Ingrid Größl & Peter Stahlecker, 2000. "Competitive supply behavior when price information is fuzzy," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 45-66, February.
    9. Trabelsi, Mohamed Ali, 2006. "Les Nouveaux Modèles de Décision dans le Risque et l’Incertain : Quel Apport ?
      [The New Models of Decision Under Risk or Uncertainty : What Approach?]
      ," MPRA Paper 76954, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:car:ciorup:89-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sabrina Robineau). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.