IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2616.html

Reported Innovation Intensity of Electricity and Gas DSOs Around the World

Author

Listed:
  • Pollitt, M. G.
  • Duma, A.
  • Covatariu, A.
  • Nillesen, P.

Abstract

Electricity and gas distribution system operators (DSOs) are expected to play a crucial role in the energy transition. Hence, incentivizing innovation in this sector, which displays natural monopoly features, is becoming increasingly relevant. Measuring in novation is notoriously difficult, as both the inputs (funding innovative activities) and outputs (patents, publications or new adopted technologies and processes) are imprecisely measured and challenging to compare across countries. To address this, we take a text analysis approach to measuring innovation in DSOs, based on occurrences of innovation signaling words. Starting from a sample of 194 electricity DSOs and 73 gas DSOs, this paper measures innovation intensity based on DSO corporate reporting. The results are compared across different DSO characteristics like size, performance, structure, ownership and geographic location.

Suggested Citation

  • Pollitt, M. G. & Duma, A. & Covatariu, A. & Nillesen, P., 2026. "Reported Innovation Intensity of Electricity and Gas DSOs Around the World," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2616, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication-cwpe-pdfs/cwpe2616.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerben Panne, 2007. "Issues in measuring innovation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(3), pages 495-507, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilfred Dolfsma & Gerben Velde, 2014. "Industry innovativeness, firm size, and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter Mark III?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 713-736, September.
    2. Morone, Piergiuseppe & Petraglia, Carmelo & Testa, Giuseppina, 2008. "Proximity and Innovation in Italian SMEs," MPRA Paper 13329, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Josef Taalbi & Mikhail Martynovich, 2024. "On the urban bias of patents and the scaling of innovation," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2422, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2024.
    4. Josef Taalbi, 2022. "Long-run patterns in the discovery of the adjacent possible," Papers 2208.00907, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    5. Philippe Bertheau & Claude Roche & Nicolas Dufour, 2015. "Evaluation et valorisation lors de la conception innovante : vers un contrôle de gestion de l'immatériel adapté aux processus d'innovation;," Post-Print hal-01187111, HAL.
    6. Teemu Makkonen & Robert P. Have, 2013. "Benchmarking regional innovative performance: composite measures and direct innovation counts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 247-262, January.
    7. Astrid Kander & Josef Taalbi & Juha Oksanen & Karolin Sjöö & Nina Rilla, 2019. "Innovation trends and industrial renewal in Finland and Sweden 1970–2013," Scandinavian Economic History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(1), pages 47-70, January.
    8. Bălașa, M. & Pollitt, M. G., 2026. "Have Zonal Electricity Prices in Sweden Caused Industrial (Re-)locations?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2615, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.