IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v35y2026i1p123-149..html

Long-run patterns in the discovery of the adjacent possible

Author

Listed:
  • Josef Taalbi

Abstract

The notion of the “adjacent possible” has been advanced to theorize the generation of novelty across many different research domains. This study is an attempt to examine in what way the notion can be made empirically useful for innovation studies. A new theoretical framework is construed based on the notion of innovation as a search process where knowledge is recombined to discover the adjacent possible. The framework makes testable predictions about the rate of innovation, the distribution of innovations across organizations, and the rate of diversification of product portfolios. The empirical section examines how well this framework predicts long-run patterns of new product introductions in Sweden, 1908–2016, and explores the long-run evolution of the product space of Swedish organizations. The results suggest that, remarkably, the rate of innovation depends linearly on cumulative innovations, which explains advantages of incumbent firms but excludes the emergence of winner-take-all distributions. The results also suggest that the rate of development of new types of products follows Heaps’ law, where the share of new product types within organizations declines over time. Finally, the study also demonstrates that the structure of the Swedish product space carries important information about adjacent possible innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Josef Taalbi, 2026. "Long-run patterns in the discovery of the adjacent possible," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 35(1), pages 123-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:123-149.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtaf028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:35:y:2026:i:1:p:123-149.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.