IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2024_580v2.html

Feed for good? On the effects of personalization algorithms in social media platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Risco

  • Manuel Lleonart-Anguix

Abstract

This paper builds a theoretical model of communication and learning on a social media platform, and describes the algorithm an engagement-maximizing platform implements in equilibrium. This algorithm overexploits similarities between users, locking them in echo chambers. Moreover, learning vanishes as platform size grows large. As this is far from ideal, we explore alternatives. The reverse-chronological algorithm that social platforms reincorporated after the DSA was enacted turns out to be insufficient, so we construct the "breaking-echo-chambers" algorithm, which improves learning by promoting opposite viewpoints. Finally, we advocate for horizontal interoperability as a regulatory measure to align platform incentives with social welfare. By eliminating platform-specific network effects, interoperability incentivizes platforms to adopt algorithms that maximize user well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Risco & Manuel Lleonart-Anguix, 2024. "Feed for good? On the effects of personalization algorithms in social media platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_580v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Dec 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2024_580v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp580
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew O. Jackson & Suraj Malladi & David McAdams, 2022. "Learning through the grapevine and the impact of the breadth and depth of social networks," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 119(34), pages 2205549119-, August.
    2. BELLEFLAMME, Paul, & PEITZ, Martin,, 2019. "The competitive impacts of exclusivity and price transparency in markets with digital platforms," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2019019, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Guigon & Marie Claire Villeval & Jean-Claude Dreher, 2024. "Metacognition biases information seeking in assessing ambiguous news," Post-Print hal-04848999, HAL.
    2. Miguel Risco & Manuel Lleonart-Anguix, 2024. "Feed for good? On the effects of personalization algorithms in social platforms," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_580, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Hsu, Chin-Chia & Ajorlou, Amir & Jadbabaie, Ali, 2025. "A game-theoretic model of misinformation spread on social networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 386-407.
    4. Juan Manuel Sanchez‐Cartas & Gonzalo León, 2021. "Multisided Platforms And Markets: A Survey Of The Theoretical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 452-487, April.
    5. Pierre-Jean Benghozi & Françoise Benhamou, 2021. "Media and the Internet Access Providers in an Era of Convergence," Post-Print halshs-03503861, HAL.
    6. McAdams, David & Song, Yangbo, 2025. "Adoption epidemics and viral marketing," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 20(2), May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2024_580v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.