IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compliance-adjusted intervention effects in survival data


  • Lois G. Kim

    () (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge)

  • Ian R. White

    (MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge)


Time-to-event endpoints are a common outcome of interest in randomised clinical trials. The primary analysis should usually be by intention-to-treat, giving an indication of the effectiveness of the intervention in a population as a whole. However, the benefit specifically for an individual receiving the intervention is becoming increasingly important as patient decisions become more evidence-based. Effectiveness is defined as the benefit of intervention as actually applied, and may be estimated from simple all-or-nothing compliance data. Efficacy, on the other hand, is the benefit of intervention under ideal circumstances, and requires more complex compliance data. Intervention effectiveness and efficacy after accounting for non-compliance can be estimated in various ways, some of which have already been implemented in Stata (e.g. Author-Email: strbee). Recently, Loeys and Goetghebeur (2003) provided new methodology using proportional-hazards techniques in survival data where compliance is all-or-nothing in the intervention arm and perfect in the control arm. Here, their method is implemented in Stata. The output is a hazard ratio for the effectiveness of intervention, adjusted for observed adherence to intervention in the treated group. An example application is discussed for a subset of a large, randomised trial of screening where the average benefit of 26% risk reduction becomes a 34% risk reduction for individuals attending screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Lois G. Kim & Ian R. White, 2004. "Compliance-adjusted intervention effects in survival data," United Kingdom Stata Users' Group Meetings 2004 15, Stata Users Group.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:15

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Presentation slides
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. T. Loeys & E. Goetghebeur, 2003. "A Causal Proportional Hazards Estimator for the Effect of Treatment Actually Received in a Randomized Trial with All-or-Nothing Compliance," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 100-105, March.
    2. Ian R. White & Sarah Walker & Abdel Babiker, 2002. "strbee: Randomization-based efficacy estimator," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 2(2), pages 140-150, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:usug04:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.