Usury Redux: Notes on The Scholastic Analysis of Usury by John T. Noonan
I summarize the key points of the scholastic theory of usury following The Scholastic Analysis of Usury by John T. Noonan. Usury is the sin of taking interest on a loan without a just title. According to Scholastic moral theology, interest on loans may be justified by the extrinsic titles to damnum emergens and lucrum cessans, i.e. for losses incurred or for profits lost. Implications of this teaching are discussed with regard to other contracts, such as partnerships, the census contract, bills of exchange and “dry exchange,” insurance contracts, and the so-called triple contract. Also discussed are the changes in the practices of confessors that occurred between 1822 and 1836.
|Date of creation:||Jul 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Note:||Corrected 2011-11-15. The title of the book was referrred to as Scholastic Theory of Usury in earlier version. Correct titile is Scholastic Analysis of Usury.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.avemaria.edu/economics
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Joseph Burke, 2008. "Money for Nothing: The Sin of Usury," Working Papers 0801, Ave Maria University, Department of Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avm:wpaper:0901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joseph Burke)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.