IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.03552.html

An Entropic Factor Model for Robust Portfolio Replication

Author

Listed:
  • Argimiro Arratia
  • Henryk Gzyl

Abstract

Portfolio replication, or the construction of a tradable basket of assets to match the risk-return profile of a target benchmark, is fundamentally an ill-posed inverse problem. When restricted to a subset of available assets, classical variance-minimizing models often yield unstable, over-leveraged portfolios highly vulnerable to market shocks. We propose a unified, two-stage methodology rooted in information theory to achieve robust portfolio replication. First, we model the constituent asset returns against target factors, estimating parameters within data-driven empirical bounds via an entropy minimization principle. Second, using the same entropic approach, we determine the optimal weight replication. In both cases we use an entropy function of the Fermi-Dirac type defined directly on sets of constraints of the inverse problem. We validate this Entropic Factor Model (EFM) against standard Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) across five numerical experiments, including standard equity tracking, multi-asset synthesis, and severe stress-test scenarios. Empirical results demonstrate that the EFM consistently outperforms OLS in terms of annualized turnover and net-of-fees returns. Crucially, during the COVID-19 market crash and under severe idiosyncratic data corruption, the entropic framework acts as a probabilistic ``circuit breaker", defensively reducing capital allocation to compromised assets and providing a highly robust, risk-averse solution for generalized portfolio replication.

Suggested Citation

  • Argimiro Arratia & Henryk Gzyl, 2026. "An Entropic Factor Model for Robust Portfolio Replication," Papers 2609.03552, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.03552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.03552
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Argimiro Arratia & Henryk Gzyl, 2025. "An Entropic Approach to Constrained Linear Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Joel L. Horowitz, 2014. "Ill-Posed Inverse Problems in Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 21-51, August.
    3. Miguel Lobo & Maryam Fazel & Stephen Boyd, 2007. "Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 341-365, July.
    4. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    5. Buchen, Peter W. & Kelly, Michael, 1996. "The Maximum Entropy Distribution of an Asset Inferred from Option Prices," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 143-159, March.
    6. B. Fastrich & S. Paterlini & P. Winker, 2015. "Constructing optimal sparse portfolios using regularization methods," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 417-434, July.
    7. Lamont, Owen A., 2001. "Economic tracking portfolios," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 161-184, November.
    8. Zhang, Yanyi & De Smedt, Johannes, 2024. "Index tracking using shapley additive explanations and one-dimensional pointwise convolutional autoencoders," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    9. Argimiro Arratia & Henryk Gzyl & Silvia Mayoral, 2024. "How to Keep Your Portfolio Close in Risk and Diversification to a Desired Benchmark," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(3), pages 1489-1505, September.
    10. Anil Bera & Sung Park, 2008. "Optimal Portfolio Diversification Using the Maximum Entropy Principle," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4-6), pages 484-512.
    11. Huberman, Gur & Kandel, Shmuel & Stambaugh, Robert F, 1987. "Mimicking Portfolios and Exact Arbitrage Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(1), pages 1-9, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cisil Sarisoy & Bas J. M. Werker, 2024. "Linear Factor Models and the Estimation of Expected Returns," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2024-014, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    2. Seyoung Park & Eun Ryung Lee & Sungchul Lee & Geonwoo Kim, 2019. "Dantzig Type Optimization Method with Applications to Portfolio Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, June.
    3. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    4. Paolella, Marc S. & Polak, Paweł & Walker, Patrick S., 2021. "A non-elliptical orthogonal GARCH model for portfolio selection under transaction costs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Michele Costola & Bertrand Maillet & Zhining Yuan & Xiang Zhang, 2024. "Mean–variance efficient large portfolios: a simple machine learning heuristic technique based on the two-fund separation theorem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 334(1), pages 133-155, March.
    6. Frahm, Gabriel & Wiechers, Christof, 2011. "On the diversification of portfolios of risky assets," Discussion Papers in Econometrics and Statistics 2/11, University of Cologne, Institute of Econometrics and Statistics.
    7. MacKinlay, A Craig & Pastor, Lubos, 2000. "Asset Pricing Models: Implications for Expected Returns and Portfolio Selection," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 883-916.
    8. Haoran Wang & Shi Yu, 2021. "Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment with Inverse Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2105.09264, arXiv.org.
    9. Taras Bodnar & Mathias Lindholm & Erik Thorsén & Joanna Tyrcha, 2021. "Quantile-based optimal portfolio selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 299-324, July.
    10. Hafner, Christian M. & Wang, Linqi, 2024. "Dynamic portfolio selection with sector-specific regularization," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 17-33.
    11. Balduzzi, Pierluigi & Robotti, Cesare, 2008. "Mimicking Portfolios, Economic Risk Premia, and Tests of Multi-Beta Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 354-368.
    12. Razvan Oprisor & Roy Kwon, 2020. "Multi-Period Portfolio Optimization with Investor Views under Regime Switching," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Gianni Pola, 2016. "On entropy and portfolio diversification," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 218-228, July.
    14. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    15. Cesare Robotti, 2003. "Dynamic strategies, asset pricing models, and the out-of-sample performance of the tangency portfolio," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 2003-6, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    16. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2022. "Sparsity and stability for minimum-variance portfolios," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 214-235, September.
    17. Sheraz, Muhammad & Drăgan, Mihăiță & Preda, Vasile, 2026. "Entropy-Based portfolio optimization under Varma–Tsallis Statistics: Evidence from stock markets," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Philipp J. Kremer & Andreea Talmaciu & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Risk minimization in multi-factor portfolios: What is the best strategy?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 266(1), pages 255-291, July.
    19. Sven Husmann & Antoniya Shivarova & Rick Steinert, 2020. "Company classification using machine learning," Papers 2004.01496, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    20. Manish, & Chahal, Rishman Jot Kaur, 2026. "Bridging behavioral insights and quantitative finance: AI-powered Black–Litterman framework with technical and sentiment signals," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.03552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.