IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2207.04690.html

Dynamic Budget Throttling in Repeated Second-Price Auctions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaohua Chen
  • Chang Wang
  • Qian Wang
  • Yuqi Pan
  • Zhuming Shi
  • Zheng Cai
  • Yukun Ren
  • Zhihua Zhu
  • Xiaotie Deng

Abstract

In today's online advertising markets, a crucial requirement for an advertiser is to control her total expenditure within a time horizon under some budget. Among various budget control methods, throttling has emerged as a popular choice, managing an advertiser's total expenditure by selecting only a subset of auctions to participate in. This paper provides a theoretical panorama of a single advertiser's dynamic budget throttling process in repeated second-price auctions. We first establish a lower bound on the regret and an upper bound on the asymptotic competitive ratio for any throttling algorithm, respectively, when the advertiser's values are stochastic and adversarial. Regarding the algorithmic side, we propose the OGD-CB algorithm, which guarantees a near-optimal expected regret with stochastic values. On the other hand, when values are adversarial, we prove that this algorithm also reaches the upper bound on the asymptotic competitive ratio. We further compare throttling with pacing, another widely adopted budget control method, in repeated second-price auctions. In the stochastic case, we demonstrate that pacing is generally superior to throttling for the advertiser, supporting the well-known result that pacing is asymptotically optimal in this scenario. However, in the adversarial case, we give an exciting result indicating that throttling is also an asymptotically optimal dynamic bidding strategy. Our results bridge the gaps in theoretical research of throttling in repeated auctions and comprehensively reveal the ability of this popular budget-smoothing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaohua Chen & Chang Wang & Qian Wang & Yuqi Pan & Zhuming Shi & Zheng Cai & Yukun Ren & Zhihua Zhu & Xiaotie Deng, 2022. "Dynamic Budget Throttling in Repeated Second-Price Auctions," Papers 2207.04690, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.04690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.04690
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kartik Hosanagar, 2013. "Optimal Bidding in Multi-Item Multislot Sponsored Search Auctions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 855-873, August.
    2. Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2015. "Repeated Auctions with Budgets in Ad Exchanges: Approximations and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 864-884, April.
    3. Shipra Agrawal & Zizhuo Wang & Yinyu Ye, 2014. "A Dynamic Near-Optimal Algorithm for Online Linear Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 876-890, August.
    4. Alberto Vera & Siddhartha Banerjee, 2021. "The Bayesian Prophet: A Low-Regret Framework for Online Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1368-1391, March.
    5. Zhaohua Chen & Mingwei Yang & Chang Wang & Jicheng Li & Zheng Cai & Yukun Ren & Zhihua Zhu & Xiaotie Deng, 2022. "Budget-Constrained Auctions with Unassured Priors: Strategic Equivalence and Structural Properties," Papers 2203.16816, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    6. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 2001. "The Dynamic and Stochastic Knapsack Problem with Random Sized Items," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 26-41, February.
    7. Anupam Gupta & Marco Molinaro, 2016. "How the Experts Algorithm Can Help Solve LPs Online," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1404-1431, November.
    8. Stefanus Jasin & Amitabh Sinha, 2015. "An LP-Based Correlated Rounding Scheme for Multi-Item Ecommerce Order Fulfillment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1336-1351, December.
    9. Jason Acimovic & Stephen C. Graves, 2015. "Making Better Fulfillment Decisions on the Fly in an Online Retail Environment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 34-51, February.
    10. Santiago R. Balseiro & Yonatan Gur, 2019. "Learning in Repeated Auctions with Budgets: Regret Minimization and Equilibrium," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 3952-3968, September.
    11. Pornpawee Bumpensanti & He Wang, 2020. "A Re-Solving Heuristic with Uniformly Bounded Loss for Network Revenue Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2993-3009, July.
    12. Stefanus Jasin & Sunil Kumar, 2012. "A Re-Solving Heuristic with Bounded Revenue Loss for Network Revenue Management with Customer Choice," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 313-345, May.
    13. Guillermo Gallego & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2019. "Revenue Management and Pricing Analytics," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-1-4939-9606-3, December.
    14. Anton J. Kleywegt & Jason D. Papastavrou, 1998. "The Dynamic and Stochastic Knapsack Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 17-35, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Dana Pizarro, 2024. "Survey of Dynamic Resource-Constrained Reward Collection Problems: Unified Model and Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 2168-2189, September.
    2. Wanteng Ma & Ying Cao & Danny H. K. Tsang & Dong Xia, 2025. "Optimal Regularized Online Allocation by Adaptive Re-Solving," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(4), pages 2079-2096, July.
    3. Daniel Freund & Jiayu (Kamessi) Zhao, 2023. "Overbooking with Bounded Loss," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 1344-1363, August.
    4. Jiashuo Jiang & Will Ma & Jiawei Zhang, 2025. "Degeneracy Is OK: Logarithmic Regret for Network Revenue Management with Indiscrete Distributions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(6), pages 3405-3420, November.
    5. Guanting Chen & Xiaocheng Li & Yinyu Ye, 2024. "Technical Note—An Improved Analysis of LP-Based Control for Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1124-1138, May.
    6. Jiashuo Jiang & Xiaocheng Li & Jiawei Zhang, 2025. "Online Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein-Based Nonstationarity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(11), pages 9104-9122, November.
    7. Siddhartha Banerjee & Daniel Freund, 2025. "Good Prophets Know When the End Is Near," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4877-4894, June.
    8. Xiaocheng Li & Yinyu Ye, 2022. "Online Linear Programming: Dual Convergence, New Algorithms, and Regret Bounds," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2948-2966, September.
    9. Zhengchao Wang & Heikki Peura & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2024. "Randomized Assortment Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 2042-2060, September.
    10. Zikun Ye & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang & Renyu Zhang & Xin Chen & Zhiwei Xu, 2023. "Cold Start to Improve Market Thickness on Online Advertising Platforms: Data-Driven Algorithms and Field Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3838-3860, July.
    11. Santiago R. Balseiro & Haihao Lu & Vahab Mirrokni, 2023. "The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 101-119, January.
    12. David A. Goldberg & Martin I. Reiman & Qiong Wang, 2021. "A Survey of Recent Progress in the Asymptotic Analysis of Inventory Systems," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1718-1750, June.
    13. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2024. "Dynamic Matching: Characterizing and Achieving Constant Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2799-2822, May.
    14. Zihao Qu & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman, 2024. "Technical Note—Cloud Cost Optimization: Model, Bounds, and Asymptotics," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 132-150, January.
    15. Santiago Balseiro & Christian Kroer & Rachitesh Kumar, 2021. "Contextual Standard Auctions with Budgets: Revenue Equivalence and Efficiency Guarantees," Papers 2102.10476, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    16. Feng Zhu & Shaoxuan Liu & Rowan Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2023. "Assign-to-Seat: Dynamic Capacity Control for Selling High-Speed Train Tickets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 921-938, May.
    17. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Krishnamurthy Iyer, 2021. "Tractable Equilibria in Sponsored Search with Endogenous Budgets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 227-244, January.
    18. Xinchang Xie & Itai Gurvich & Simge Küçükyavuz, 2025. "Dynamic Allocation of Reusable Resources: Logarithmic Regret in Overloaded Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(4), pages 2097-2124, July.
    19. Yining Wang & He Wang, 2022. "Constant Regret Resolving Heuristics for Price-Based Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3538-3557, November.
    20. Adrian Rivera Cardoso & He Wang & Huan Xu, 2025. "The Online Saddle Point Problem and Online Convex Optimization with Knapsacks," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 1-39, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2207.04690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.