IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2107.02537.html

Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation

Author

Listed:
  • Yacine Koucha
  • Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis

Abstract

In this paper, we adapt the classic Cram\'er-Lundberg collective risk theory model to a perturbed model by adding a Wiener process to the compound Poisson process, which can be used to incorporate premium income uncertainty, interest rate fluctuations and changes in the number of policyholders. Our study is part of a Master dissertation, our aim is to make a short overview and present additionally some new approximation methods for the infinite time ruin probabilities for the perturbed risk model. We present four different approximation methods for the perturbed risk model. The first method is based on iterative upper and lower approximations to the maximal aggregate loss distribution. The second method relies on a four-moment exponential De Vylder approximation. The third method is based on the first-order Pad\'e approximation of the Renyi and De Vylder approximations. The last method is the second order Pad\'e-Ramsay approximation. These are generated by fitting one, two, three or four moments of the claim amount distribution, which greatly generalizes the approximations. We test the precision of approximations using a combination of light and heavy tailed distributions for the individual claim amount. We assess the ultimate ruin probability and present numerical results for the exponential, gamma, and mixed exponential claim distributions, demonstrating the high accuracy of these four methods. Analytical and numerical methods are used to highlight the practical implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yacine Koucha & Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis, 2021. "Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation," Papers 2107.02537, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.02537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.02537
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grandell, Jan, 2000. "Simple approximations of ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2-3), pages 157-173, May.
    2. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek Teuerle, 2011. "Ruin probability in finite time," Springer Books, in: Pavel Cizek & Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Rafał Weron (ed.), Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance, chapter 10, pages 329-348, Springer.
    3. repec:cup:astinb:v:8:y:1974:i:01:p:104-125_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. SIMAR, Leopold, 1976. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a compound Poisson process," LIDAM Reprints CORE 271, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. repec:cup:astinb:v:19:y:1989:i:01:p:71-90_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dufresne, Francois & Gerber, Hans U., 1991. "Risk theory for the compound Poisson process that is perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-59, March.
    7. Renata G. Alcoforado & Agnieszka I. Bergel & Rui M. R. Cardoso & Alfredo D. Egídio dos Reis & Eugenio V. Rodríguez-Martínez, 2022. "Ruin and Dividend Measures in the Renewal Dual Risk Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 537-569, June.
    8. repec:cup:astinb:v:12:y:1981:i:01:p:22-26_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avram, F. & Pistorius, M., 2014. "On matrix exponential approximations of ruin probabilities for the classic and Brownian perturbed Cramér–Lundberg processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 57-64.
    2. David J. Santana & Juan González-Hernández & Luis Rincón, 2017. "Approximation of the Ultimate Ruin Probability in the Classical Risk Model Using Erlang Mixtures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-798, September.
    3. Yong Wu & Xiang Hu, 2012. "Ruin Probability in Compound Poisson Process with Investment," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2012(1).
    4. Franck Adékambi & Essodina Takouda, 2020. "Gerber–Shiu Function in a Class of Delayed and Perturbed Risk Model with Dependence," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Zhang, Aili & Li, Shuanming & Wang, Wenyuan, 2023. "A scale function based approach for solving integral-differential equations in insurance risk models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    6. Payandeh Najafabadi Amir T. & MohammadPour Saeed, 2018. "A k-Inflated Negative Binomial Mixture Regression Model: Application to Rate–Making Systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, July.
    7. Kolkovska, Ekaterina T. & Martín-González, Ehyter M., 2016. "Gerber–Shiu functionals for classical risk processes perturbed by an α-stable motion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 22-28.
    8. Yang, Hu & Zhang, Zhimin, 2009. "The perturbed compound Poisson risk model with multi-layer dividend strategy," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 70-78, January.
    9. Andersson, Thomas & Brännäs, Kurt, 1991. "Explaining Cross-Country Variation in Nationalization Frequencies," Working Paper Series 319, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    10. Man Li & Ying Huang & Ya Huang & Jieming Zhou, 2024. "Robust non-zero-sum stochastic differential game of two insurers with common shock and CDS transaction," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 3, March.
    11. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Parra-Alvarez, Juan Carlos & Serrano, Rafael, 2021. "Optimal control of investment, premium and deductible for a non-life insurance company," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 384-405.
    12. Liang, Xiaoqing & Liang, Zhibin & Young, Virginia R., 2020. "Optimal reinsurance under the mean–variance premium principle to minimize the probability of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 128-146.
    13. Constantinescu, Corina & Hashorva, Enkelejd & Ji, Lanpeng, 2011. "Archimedean copulas in finite and infinite dimensions—with application to ruin problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 487-495.
    14. Florin Avram & Romain Biard & Christophe Dutang & Stéphane Loisel & Landy Rabehasaina, 2014. "A survey of some recent results on Risk Theory," Post-Print hal-01616178, HAL.
    15. Chi, Yichun, 2010. "Analysis of the expected discounted penalty function for a general jump-diffusion risk model and applications in finance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 385-396, April.
    16. Seungchul Baek & Junyong Park, 2022. "A computationally efficient approach to estimating species richness and rarefaction curve," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1919-1941, September.
    17. Tsai, Cary Chi-Liang & Willmot, Gordon E., 2002. "A generalized defective renewal equation for the surplus process perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 51-66, February.
    18. Chi, Yichun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2011. "On the threshold dividend strategy for a generalized jump-diffusion risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 326-337, May.
    19. Gatto, Riccardo, 2008. "A saddlepoint approximation to the probability of ruin in the compound Poisson process with diffusion," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(13), pages 1948-1954, September.
    20. Vaios Dermitzakis & Konstadinos Politis, 2011. "Asymptotics for the Moments of the Time to Ruin for the Compound Poisson Model Perturbed by Diffusion," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 749-761, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.02537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.