IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1605.07884.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Arbitrage and Hedging to Acceptability under Transaction Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Lepinette
  • Ilya Molchanov

Abstract

The classical discrete time model of proportional transaction costs relies on the assumption that a feasible portfolio process has solvent increments at each step. We extend this setting in two directions, allowing for convex transaction costs and assuming that increments of the portfolio process belong to the sum of a solvency set and a family of multivariate acceptable positions, e.g. with respect to a dynamic risk measure. We describe the sets of superhedging prices, formulate several no (risk) arbitrage conditions and explore connections between them. In the special case when multivariate positions are converted into a single fixed asset, our framework turns into the no good deals setting. However, in general, the possibilities of assessing the risk with respect to any asset or a basket of the assets lead to a decrease of superhedging prices and the no arbitrage conditions become stronger. The mathematical technique relies on results for unbounded and possibly non-closed random sets in Euclidean space.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Lepinette & Ilya Molchanov, 2016. "Risk Arbitrage and Hedging to Acceptability under Transaction Costs," Papers 1605.07884, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1605.07884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.07884
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Kaina & L. Rüschendorf, 2009. "On convex risk measures on L p -spaces," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 475-495, July.
    2. Ilya Molchanov & Ignacio Cascos, 2016. "Multivariate Risk Measures: A Constructive Approach Based On Selections," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 867-900, October.
    3. Yuri Kabanov, 2009. "Markets with Transaction Costs. Mathematical Theory," Post-Print hal-00488168, HAL.
    4. Andreas H. Hamel & Birgit Rudloff & Mihaela Yankova, 2012. "Set-valued average value at risk and its computation," Papers 1202.5702, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2013.
    5. Walter Schachermayer, 2004. "The Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under Proportional Transaction Costs in Finite Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 19-48, January.
    6. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "Multi-portfolio time consistency for set-valued convex and coherent risk measures," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 67-107, January.
    7. Alexander Cherny & Pavel Grigoriev, 2007. "Dilatation monotone risk measures are law invariant," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 291-298, April.
    8. Ignacio Cascos & Ilya Molchanov, 2013. "Multivariate risk measures: a constructive approach based on selections," Papers 1301.1496, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    9. Hiai, Fumio & Umegaki, Hisaharu, 1977. "Integrals, conditional expectations, and martingales of multivalued functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 149-182, March.
    10. Ignacio Cascos & Ilya Molchanov, 2007. "Multivariate risks and depth-trimmed regions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 373-397, July.
    11. Andreas Löhne & Birgit Rudloff, 2014. "An Algorithm For Calculating The Set Of Superhedging Portfolios In Markets With Transaction Costs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 1-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Haier & Ilya Molchanov & Michael Schmutz, 2015. "Intragroup transfers, intragroup diversification and their risk assessment," Papers 1511.06320, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2016.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Lépinette & Ilya Molchanov, 2021. "Risk arbitrage and hedging to acceptability under transaction costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 101-132, January.
    2. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "A recursive algorithm for multivariate risk measures and a set-valued Bellman's principle," Papers 1508.02367, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2016.
    3. Ilya Molchanov & Anja Muhlemann, 2019. "Nonlinear expectations of random sets," Papers 1903.04901, arXiv.org.
    4. Andreas Haier & Ilya Molchanov & Michael Schmutz, 2015. "Intragroup transfers, intragroup diversification and their risk assessment," Papers 1511.06320, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2016.
    5. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2017. "A recursive algorithm for multivariate risk measures and a set-valued Bellman’s principle," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 47-69, May.
    6. Emmanuel Lepinette & Ilya Molchanov, 2017. "Conditional cores and conditional convex hulls of random sets," Papers 1711.10303, arXiv.org.
    7. Cascos Fernández, Ignacio & Molchanov, Ilya, 2013. "Multivariate risk measures : a constructive approach based on selections," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws130101, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    8. Shuo Gong & Yijun Hu & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "Risk measurement of joint risk of portfolios: a liquidity shortfall aspect," Papers 2212.04848, arXiv.org.
    9. Emmanuel Lepinette, 2020. "Random optimization on random sets," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(1), pages 159-173, February.
    10. Haier Andreas & Molchanov Ilya, 2019. "Multivariate risk measures in the non-convex setting," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 36(1-4), pages 25-35, December.
    11. Yanhong Chen & Yijun Hu, 2019. "Set-Valued Law Invariant Coherent And Convex Risk Measures," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Andreas Haier & Ilya Molchanov, 2019. "Multivariate risk measures in the non-convex setting," Papers 1902.00766, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    13. c{C}au{g}{i}n Ararat & Zachary Feinstein, 2019. "Set-Valued Risk Measures as Backward Stochastic Difference Inclusions and Equations," Papers 1912.06916, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    14. Ilya Molchanov & Anja Mühlemann, 2021. "Nonlinear expectations of random sets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 5-41, January.
    15. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2015. "A Supermartingale Relation for Multivariate Risk Measures," Papers 1510.05561, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2018.
    16. Çağın Ararat & Zachary Feinstein, 2021. "Set-valued risk measures as backward stochastic difference inclusions and equations," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 43-76, January.
    17. Çağin Ararat & Andreas H. Hamel & Birgit Rudloff, 2017. "Set-Valued Shortfall And Divergence Risk Measures," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(05), pages 1-48, August.
    18. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    19. Andreas H. Hamel & Frank Heyde, 2021. "Set-Valued T -Translative Functions and Their Applications in Finance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-33, September.
    20. Antonio Avilés López & José Miguel Zapata García, 2020. "Boolean Valued Representation of Random Sets and Markov Kernels with Application to Large Deviations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1605.07884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.