IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Non-Smooth Payoffs on the Penalty Approximation of American Options


  • Sam Howison
  • Christoph Reisinger
  • Jan Hendrik Witte


This article combines various methods of analysis to draw a comprehensive picture of penalty approximations to the value, hedge ratio, and optimal exercise strategy of American options. While convergence of the penalised solution for sufficiently smooth obstacles is well established in the literature, sharp rates of convergence and particularly the effect of gradient discontinuities (i.e., the omni-present `kinks' in option payoffs) on this rate have not been fully analysed so far. This effect becomes important not least when using penalisation as a numerical technique. We use matched asymptotic expansions to characterise the boundary layers between exercise and hold regions, and to compute first order corrections for representative payoffs on a single asset following a diffusion or jump-diffusion model. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the viscosity theory framework in [Jakobsen, 2006] can be applied to this setting to derive upper and lower bounds on the value. In a small extension to [Bensoussan & Lions, 1982], we derive weak convergence rates also for option sensitivities for convex payoffs under jump-diffusion models. Finally, we outline applications of the results, including accuracy improvements by extrapolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Howison & Christoph Reisinger & Jan Hendrik Witte, 2010. "The Effect of Non-Smooth Payoffs on the Penalty Approximation of American Options," Papers 1008.0836,, revised May 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1008.0836

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Karel in 't Hout & Radoslav Valkov, 2016. "Numerical study of splitting methods for American option valuation," Papers 1610.09622,

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1008.0836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.