Measuring horizontal inequity in health care using Belgian panel data
We estimate the determinants of utilisation of physician and hospital services in Belgium using four different regression techniques. We apply a one- and two-part panel count data model, and a oneand two part cross-section count data model. We conclude that the two-part panel count data model is most appropriate as it controls for unobserved heterogeneity and allows for a two-part decision making process. The estimates of the determinants of utilisation of health care are then used to calculate indices of horizontal inequity. We find that there is little difference between the indices based on cross-section and the indices based on panel estimators. We further present longitudinal evidence on equity in Belgian health care and find that all indices are stable across years. We also find that general practitioner and hospital care are pro-poor distributed, while horizontal equity applies to specialist care. We further show that the inequity might be different for (i) the probability to contact the health care sector, (ii) the conditional number of visits, and (iii) the unconditional number of visits.
|Date of creation:||Oct 2002|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerpen|
Web page: https://www.uantwerp.be/en/faculties/applied-economic-sciences/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2002034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joeri Nys)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.