IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkpbs/068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bürokratieabbau: Was Deutschland von einer Bäckereikette lernen kann

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Friebel

    (Goethe University of Frankfurt, CEPR, and IZA)

  • Matthias Heinz

    (University of Cologne, CEPR, and Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods)

  • Mitchell Hoffman

    (UC Santa Barbara, NBER, CEPR, and IZA)

  • Tobias Kretschmer

    (LMU Munich and CEPR)

  • Nick Zubanov

    (University of Konstanz and IZA)

Abstract

Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt, was geschieht, wenn Unternehmen Dokumentationspflichten reduzieren. Eine große deutsche Bäckereikette hat in zufällig ausgewählten Filialen zwei Checklisten abgeschafft, die viele Beschäftigte als zeitaufwendig und wenig hilfreich empfunden haben. Das Ergebnis: mehr Umsatz, zufriedenere Mitarbeitende und weniger Fluktuation. Die Bäckereikette steht exemplarisch für den deutschen Mittelstand: traditionsbewusst, qualitätsorientiert, dezentral organisiert – und eingebunden in ein ausgeklügeltes, über Jahre gewachsenes Kontrollsystem. Von der evidenzbasierten Analyse des Bürokratieabbaus können nicht nur andere Unternehmen, sondern auch der Staat lernen.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Friebel & Matthias Heinz & Mitchell Hoffman & Tobias Kretschmer & Nick Zubanov, 2025. "Bürokratieabbau: Was Deutschland von einer Bäckereikette lernen kann," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 068, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkpbs/ECONtribute_PB_068_2025.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Monitoring; Checklisten; Dokumentationspflichten;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M5 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.