IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersrr/340569.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Analysis of the Effect of Sunsetting Tax Provisions for Family Farm Households

Author

Listed:
  • McDonald, Tia M.
  • Durst, Ron

Abstract

Two recent laws enacted temporary provisions to the Federal tax code: the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The authors of this report assess the impact of these expired and expiring Federal income and estate tax policies on tax liabilities for farm households. The authors estimate that the expiration of the temporary provisions of the ARPA and TCJA would increase farm households’ Federal income tax liabilities by $8.9 billion and estate tax liabilities by $647 million the year following expiration. The change in tax liabilities varies by farm size and for groups of farmers considered underserved by USDA programs. This analysis suggests that the combined effect of the sunsetting of reduced individual income tax rates, the increased standard deduction, a cap on State and local tax deductions, and the elimination of the personal exemptions would have the largest impact on underserved and all other farm households, except for very large farm households identified as those with annual gross cash farm income above $5 million. For these very large farm households, the sunsetting of the qualified business income deduction (QBID) would result in the largest increase in tax liabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • McDonald, Tia M. & Durst, Ron, 2024. "An Analysis of the Effect of Sunsetting Tax Provisions for Family Farm Households," Economic Research Report 340569, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:340569
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340569/files/err-328.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics; Financial Economics; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersrr:340569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.