IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/396233.html

Global Ethanol Mandates: Opportunities for U.S. Exports of Ethanol and DDGS

Author

Listed:
  • Beckman, Jayson
  • Nigatu, Getachew

Abstract

Before 2001, only Brazil and Paraguay required ethanol to be blended with gasoline for fuel use. With biofuel production still in the nascent stage, these countries were unable to meet those mandates. From 2001 to 2010, ethanol-use mandates adopted by the United States and the European Union (EU), along with favorable market conditions, stimulated a rapid increase in ethanol production in the United States, the EU, and Brazil. By 2016, an additional 26 countries had adopted mandates, and others had set ethanol targets or were using ethanol without an official requirement. Many of these countries have difficulty meeting their mandates with domestic production. Some import ethanol (e.g., Canada and Japan); others have barriers against imports (e.g., Argentina and China). If these countries strive to meet their mandates and open their borders to trade, they could present strong export opportunities for U.S. ethanol, assuming the United States can sufficiently expand production. The United States currently is the world’s largest producer and exporter of ethanol. It also supplies 85 percent of the world’s distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS), a coproduct of grain-based ethanol production that is used in animal feed. This report also discusses the potential for changes in DDGS trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Beckman, Jayson & Nigatu, Getachew, 2017. "Global Ethanol Mandates: Opportunities for U.S. Exports of Ethanol and DDGS," Miscellaneous Publications 396233, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:396233
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.396233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/396233/files/BIO-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.396233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckman, Jayson, "undated". "Biofuel Use in International Markets: The Importance of Trade," Economic Information Bulletin 262114, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentin Guye, 2025. "Indirect Land use Change Mechanisms: Tests from Biofuel Mandates and Pantropical Agriculture," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(12), pages 3329-3365, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harri Kalimo & Filip Sedefov & Max S. Jansson, 2017. "Market definition as value reconciliation: the case of renewable energy promotion under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 427-443, June.
    2. Dumortier, Jerome & Carriquiry, Miguel & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Where does all the biofuel go? Fuel efficiency gains and its effects on global agricultural production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    3. Miller, Jesse & Clark, Christopher M. & Peterson, Steve & Newes, Emily, 2024. "Estimated attribution of the RFS program on soybean biodiesel in the U.S. using the bioenergy scenario model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Ram N. Acharya & Rafael Perez-Pena, 2020. "Role of Comparative Advantage in Biofuel Policy Adoption in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Popp, József & Harangi–Rákos, Mónika & Antal, Gabriella & Balogh, Péter & Lengyel, Péter & Oláh, Judit, 2016. "Substitution Of Traditional Animal Feed With Co-Products Of Biofuel Production: Economic, Land-Use And Ghg Emissions Implications," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17.
    7. Stefan Renckens & Grace Skogstad & Matthieu Mondou, 2017. "When Normative and Market Power Interact: The European Union and Global Biofuels Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1432-1448, November.
    8. Taku Fundira & Giles Henley, 2017. "Biofuels in Southern Africa: Political economy, trade, and policy environment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-48, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Taku Fundira & Giles Henley, 2017. "Biofuels in Southern Africa: Political economy, trade, and policy environment," WIDER Working Paper Series 048, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:396233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.