IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/308288.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Implications of Cleaning Corn in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Chin-Zen
  • Lin, William

Abstract

Although foreign buyers prefer low-BCFM (broken corn and foreign material) corn, cleaning is not the solution to quality issues associated with U.S. corn cleanliness. The cost of cleaning corn above the current level at the least net-cost locations, both inland subterminals and river elevators, exceeds domestic benefits by $49 million. Because of the breakage susceptibility of corn kernels, the BCFM level in U.S. corn increases as corn moves toward ports. Thus, cleaning at the current level would still need to occur at every point in the marketing channel along with the additional cleaning to lower the BCFM level. The best approach to address the corn cleanliness issue is to reduce breakage susceptibility in corn through careful selection of drying systems and developing genotypes or hybrid varieties less prone to breakage.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Chin-Zen & Lin, William, 1994. "Economic Implications of Cleaning Corn in the United States," Agricultural Economic Reports 308288, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308288
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308288/files/aer686.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ash, Mark S., 1992. "Animal Feeds Compendium," Agricultural Economic Reports 308262, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Sundquist, W. Burt & Menz, Kenneth M. & Neumeyer, Catherine F., 1982. "A Technology Assessment of Commercial Corn Production in the United States," Station Bulletins 51106, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, William & Lin, Chin-Zen & Leath, Mack, 1994. "Costs and Benefits of Cleaning U.S. Corn: Overview and Implications," Agricultural Economic Reports 308289, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Sheffield, Sharon S., 1993. "Russian Federation: Determinants of Wheat Import Demand," Staff Reports 278728, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Tauer, Loren W., 1988. "The economic impact of future biological nitrogen fixation technologies," Working Papers 7271, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. McCormick, Ian. & Davison, Cecil W. & Hoskin, Roger L., 1992. "The U.S. Sunflower Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305475, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Caswell, Margriet F. & Fuglie, Keith O. & Klotz, Cassandra A., 1994. "Agricultural Biotechnology: An Economic Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 262025, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Sheffield, Sharon S. & Hoskin, Roger, 1995. "Russian Federation: Determinants of Corn Import Demand," Staff Reports 278777, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Ekanem, Enefiok P. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1993. "Estimating Marginal Implicit Prices For Selected Quality Attributes Of Hybrid Seed Corn," Staff Papers 13473, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Sundquist, W.B., 1984. "Agriculture's Productivity and Technology Base," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 278927, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Lin, William, 1996. "Costs and Benefits of Cleaning U.S. Soybeans: Overview and Implications," Agricultural Economic Reports 262035, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Eric Giraud-Heraud & Chantal Le Mouël & Vincent Requillart & . Inra - Direction Scientifique Des Sciences Sociales & . Inra - Esr. Département d'Economie Et Sociologie Rurales, Ivry, 1994. "Impact de la réforme de la PAC sur les débouchés du corn gluten feed," Post-Print hal-02299663, HAL.
    11. Wang, Sun Ling & Heisey, Paul & Schimmelpfennig, David & Ball, Eldon, 2015. "Agricultural Productivity Growth in the United States: Measurement, Trends, and Drivers," Economic Research Report 207954, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.