IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerscc/292014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Costs of Benefit Delivery in the Food Stamp Program: Lessons From a Cross-Program Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Isaacs, Julia

Abstract

This study compares the Food Stamp Program (FSP) with eight other public assistance programs across four measures of program effectiveness—administrative costs, error payments, program access, and benefit targeting. The comparison includes two other USDA nutrition assistance programs, three cash assistance programs, and three programs providing noncash benefits other than food or nutrition assistance. Results show that the FSP and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) present contrasting patterns. The EITC program has lower administrative costs and higher program access rates than the FSP, but the FSP is more successful in limiting overpayments. Missing information makes it hard to generalize across the other programs, but there is some evidence suggesting that programs with higher errors have lower administrative costs. Low administrative costs also appear to be inversely associated with good program access for recipients. Also, programs that are more highly targeted tend to have higher benefit delivery costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaacs, Julia, 2008. "The Costs of Benefit Delivery in the Food Stamp Program: Lessons From a Cross-Program Analysis," Contractor and Cooperator Reports 292014, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292014
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.292014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292014/files/ccr-39.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.292014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliveira, Victor & Prell, Mark & Tiehen, Laura & Smallwood, David, 2018. "Design Issues in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Looking Ahead by Looking Back," Economic Research Report 276253, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Nezih Guner & Remzi Kaygusuz & Gustavo Ventura, 2023. "Rethinking the Welfare State," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2261-2294, November.
    3. David Wittenburg & Kenneth Fortson & David Stapleton & Noelle Denny-Brown & Rosalind Keith & David R. Mann & Heinrich Hock & Heather Gordon, "undated". "Promoting Opportunity Demonstration: Design Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a7bdd8ca145748bd892b3438d, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerscc:292014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.