IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

O Debate Brasileiro Sobre Pluriatividade: Implicações Sobre O Desenvolvimento Rural E As Políticas Públicas

Listed author(s):
  • Souza, Raquel Pereira
  • Souza, Marcelo Santos
Registered author(s):

    O fenômeno da pluriatividade tem sido um tema bastante debatido e controverso. Nesse debate destacam-se duas perspectivas teóricas que polarizam o debate que são: a do “novo rural” e a da pluriatividade como “estratégia de reprodução social”. Essas perspectivas, apesar de vêem esse fenômeno como eixo dinâmico para o desenvolvimento do meio rural, possuem interpretações diferentes do que vem a ser a pluriatividade. Assim, esse artigo tem por objetivo esclarecer as diferenças, no que diz respeito às construções teóricas de cada uma delas, conceitos utilizados e implicações, tanto no que diz respeito aos elementos necessários para a construção de um processo virtuoso de desenvolvimento, quanto às implicações deste em termos de políticas públicas. Aponta-se que, apesar de ambas perspectivas tratarem do mesmo fenômeno, as implicações em termos de políticas públicas são parcialmente distintas, como decorrência das origens teóricas de ambas.---------------------------------------------The phenomenon of the pluriactivities has been a theme quite discussed and controversial. In that debate they stand out two theoretical perspectives that they polarize the debate: the perspective of the "new rural" and the other which the pluriatividade is considerate an "strategy of social reproduction." Those perspectives, in spite of they see that phenomenon as dynamic axis for the development of the rural way, they possess interpretations different from what comes to be the pluriactivities. Like this, that article has for objective to explain the differences between this theoretical perspectives, in what it says respect about, the theoretical constructions, concepts, the elements that are necessary for the construction of a virtuous process of development and the implications of this in terms of public politics. It is appeared that, in spite of both perspectives they treat of the same phenomenon, the implications in terms of public politics are partially different, as consequence of the theoretical origins of both.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER) in its series 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brasil with number 109203.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Jul 2008
    Handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109203
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Abramovay, Ricardo, 2003. "Mercados do empreendedorismo de pequeno porte no Brasil," Oficina de la CEPAL en Brasilia (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28354, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. José Graziano da Silva, 1997. "O novo rural brasileiro," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 7(1), pages 43-81, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sbrfsr:109203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.