IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saeaed/6817.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost to Produce Cellulosic Biomass Feedstock: Four Perennial Grass Species Compared

Author

Listed:
  • Haque, Mohua
  • Epplin, Francis M.
  • Aravindhakshan, Sijesh C.
  • Taliaferro, Charles M.

Abstract

Switchgrass has been proposed as a dedicated energy crop to fulfill long-term policy goals. Production costs were determined for switchgrass and three alternative perennial grass species for four levels of nitrogen fertilizer and two harvest systems. For the alternatives evaluated, biomass production cost per ton was lowest for switchgrass.

Suggested Citation

  • Haque, Mohua & Epplin, Francis M. & Aravindhakshan, Sijesh C. & Taliaferro, Charles M., 2008. "Cost to Produce Cellulosic Biomass Feedstock: Four Perennial Grass Species Compared," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6817, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeaed:6817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/6817
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Park, Seong Cheol & Vitale, Jeffrey D. & Turner, Jason Clemn & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Hattey, Jeffory A., 2011. "Economic Potential of Swine Effluent in Intensified Forage Systems in the Southern Plains," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers.
    2. Mooney, Daniel F. & Roberts, Roland K. & English, Burton C. & Tyler, Donald D. & Larson, James A., 2008. "Switchgrass Production in Marginal Environments: A Comparative Economic Analysis across Four West Tennessee Landscapes," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6403, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Acheampong, Kwame & Dicks, Michael R. & Adam, Brian D., 2011. "The Impact of Biofuel Mandates and Switchgrass Production on Hay Markets," 2011 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2011, Corpus Christi, Texas 98797, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Chamberlain, Jim F. & Miller, Shelie A., 2012. "Policy incentives for switchgrass production using valuation of non-market ecosystem services," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 526-536.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeaed:6817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.