IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Facility Closures and Downsizing in the Rural Midwest: A Preliminary Assessment of Extent and Effects

  • Leistritz, F. Larry
  • Knapp, Tim
  • Root, Kenneth A.
  • Walzer, Norman

Rural communities across the United States have been undergoing dramatic economic restructuring. As a result, many rural communities are struggling to recover from the closure or downsizing of manufacturing facilities and to implement economic development programs. The goal of this study was to gain new insights into community, organizational, and economic factors that underlie effective rural community response to economic distress. The study covers communities with populations between 500 and 10,000 in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Data come from a survey of local government officials of all towns in the six states with populations between 500 and 10,000. Surveys were mailed to 2,118 towns during the summer of 1993, of which 1,396 useable questionnaires were returned, for an overall response rate of almost 66 percent. Among the towns that responded, 16.3 percent reported closures or downsizing affecting 25 workers or more during the 1989 to 1992 period Retail stores were the business type that were most often reported as being closed, followed by manufacturers. The number of jobs lost per establishment was greatest in the manufacturing sector. When the community representatives were asked about the effect of the plant closing(s) on displaced workers, their responses indicated that about 38 percent of the displaced workers either remained unemployed or underemployed (11%), took lower paying jobs (14.5%), or retired early (13%). Further, about 24 percent of the workers were forced to leave the community to find work. Only 31 percent of the workers reportedly stayed in the community and obtained comparable replacement jobs. Of the towns with closures or downsizing, 46 percent evaluated the overall impacts on the community as "serious" or "severe", while 48 percent of the communities reported "serious' or "severe" economic effects. The communities utilized a wide variety of economic development strategies to adapt to business downturns and to foster business and economic growth. A major objective of the next phase of this research will be to investigate the degree to which various communities have been able to overcome their economic problems and establish stable or growing economies whereas others have had less success in sustaining their economies at pre-closure levels.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/51162
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics in its series Agricultural Economics Miscellaneous Reports with number 51162.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Mar 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:nddmrs:51162
Contact details of provider: Postal: PO Box 5636, Fargo, ND 58105-5636
Phone: (701) 231-7441
Web page: http://www.ext.nodak.edu/homepages/aedept/Email:


More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Ayres, Janet S. & Leistritz, F. Larry & Stone, Kenneth E., 1992. "Rural Retail Business Survival: Implications for Community Developers," Staff General Research Papers 11155, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddmrs:51162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.