IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncerze/31807.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Real Options Approach to Evaluating a Risky Investment by a New Generation Cooperative: Further Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Bailey, Michael D.
  • Sporleder, Thomas L.

Abstract

Farmers continue to be interested in opportunities for value added production through further processing. New Generation Cooperatives (NGCs) offer member commitment through up-front capital contributions on the part of members. For a potential start-up NGC, one of new and novel issues that face the management of an NGC is making project commitments against the total capital available, both equity and debt capital. Because of the up-front capital commitment by members, NGCs invite managers to make commitments in phases, rather than one initial go or no-go decision. Thus, the capital decision is complex and requires managerial vision in terms of an uncertain world beset by constant shifts in prices, interest rates, consumer tastes, and technology. This paper considers a novel means of evaluating this investment decision, one that encompasses risk components mentioned above. When the outcome of an investment is least certain, real options analysis has the greatest potential analytic value. As time goes by and prospects for an underlying investment become clearer, the value of an option diminishes. The methodology of real options is novel because it encourages managers, at time t, to weigh equally all imaginable alternatives, good and bad. A project's net present value (NPV) is simply the difference between the project's value and its cost. By definition of the NPV rule, managers should accept all projects with a net present value greater than zero. The distinction between real options and conventional decision-making arises in that the standard net present value rule does not take into account managerial flexibility over time. Flexibility is especially important when the project involves sunk cost investments that can never be retrieved. Typically, investment in a new processing facility is a sunk cost, once the decision is made to build the facility. The analysis herein examines a NGC for corn tortilla chip processing, comparing both conventional NPV and real options analyses. PowerSim, a dynamic simulation model, is used is the analysis. This modeled investment is sunk, and the investment in a certain technology is sunk at the time the decision is made to construct the facility. The results indicate that the flexibility of managers is an important criterion for making decisions regarding sunk cost investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Bailey, Michael D. & Sporleder, Thomas L., 2000. "The Real Options Approach to Evaluating a Risky Investment by a New Generation Cooperative: Further Processing," 2000 Annual Meeting, December 12-13 31807, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ncerze:31807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/31807
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russo, Carlo & Sabbatini, Massimo, 2005. "Incentives to Efficient Investment Decisions in Agricultural Cooperatives," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24455, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Shunmugavelu, Ramanathan, 2003. "Investment analysis of deferring a farmer owned ethanol plant: using real options," ISU General Staff Papers 2003010108000018196, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty; Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncerze:31807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/daksuus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.