IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/137211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyse der Vorschläge der EU-Kommission vom 12. Oktober 2011 zur künftigen Gestaltung der Direktzahlungen im Rahmen der GAP nach 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Forstner, Bernhard
  • Deblitz, Claus
  • Kleinhanss, Werner
  • Nieberg, Hiltrud
  • Offermann, Frank
  • Roder, Norbert
  • Salamon, Petra
  • Sanders, Jurn
  • Weingarten, Peter

Abstract

Zusammenfassung : Dieser Arbeitsbericht analysiert und bewertet die Auswirkungen der Vorschläge der EU-Kommission zur künftigen Gestaltung der Direktzahlungen an landwirtschaftliche Betriebe ab 2014. Im Mittelpunkt der auf Deutschland bezogenen Analysen stehen die Vorschläge zum sogenannten Greening, das neue Anforderungen hinsichtlich der Anbaudiversifizierung, der Bereitstellung ökologischer Vorrangflächen und des Erhalts von Dauergrünland vorsieht. Darüber hinaus werden zentrale weitere Vorschläge, wie zum Beispiel die allgemeine Kürzung der Direktzahlungen, deren mögliche Umverteilung in die 2. Säule der GAP sowie die Degression und Kappung der Zahlungen behandelt. Neben eher kurzfristig und auf das Machbare orientierten Empfehlungen betonen die Autoren der Studie, dass sie die 2. Säule der GAP für zielgerichtete Maßnahmen geeigneter halten als die 1. Säule. Daher sollten langfristig für Direktzahlungen vorgesehene Mittel zunehmend in die 2. Säule verlagert werden und dort möglichst gezielt eingesetzt werden. In der Förderperiode 2014 bis 2020 sollte Deutschland die Optionen zur Stärkung der 2. Säule ausschöpfen. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: This working paper presents recently published proposals of the European Commission for direct payments to farmers as of 2014, and both analyses and assesses their impacts. The focus lies on the so called greening measures with regard to Germany which include new requirements regarding crop rotation, the provision of ecologically favoured areas and a conservation of permanent pastures. Furthermore, the analyses deal with other important proposals, e.g. a general reduction of direct payments in Germany, their optional reallocation towards the 2. pillar of the CAP and the degression and capping of the payments. In addition to a number of feasible short term recommendations, the authors of the study stress that in the long run direct payments should be more focused on goods that are desired by society. During the funding period 2014 to 2020 Germany should fully utilize the options to strengthen the 2. pillar.

Suggested Citation

  • Forstner, Bernhard & Deblitz, Claus & Kleinhanss, Werner & Nieberg, Hiltrud & Offermann, Frank & Roder, Norbert & Salamon, Petra & Sanders, Jurn & Weingarten, Peter, 2012. "Analyse der Vorschläge der EU-Kommission vom 12. Oktober 2011 zur künftigen Gestaltung der Direktzahlungen im Rahmen der GAP nach 2013," Thünen Working Paper 137211, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:137211
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.137211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/137211/files/BW_LR_MA_04_2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.137211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Friederike Lehn & Enno Bahrs, 2018. "Land-Use Competition or Compatibility between Nature Conservation and Agriculture? The Impact of Protected Areas on German Standard Farmland Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Agricultural Finance; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Crop Production/Industries; Demand and Price Analysis; Environmental Economics and Policy; Farm Management; Land Economics/Use; Livestock Production/Industries; Political Economy; Production Economics; Productivity Analysis; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods; Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q11 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:137211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.