IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/faoaes/289008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gender inequality, risk and vulnerability in the rural economy. Refocusing the public works agenda to take account of economic and social risks

Author

Listed:
  • Holmes, Rebecca
  • Jones, Nicola

Abstract

Smallholder farmers and poor rural households are vulnerable to both economic and socialshocks which hamper their participation in agricultural activities. Well-designed social protection programmes can help to reduce both the risk and vulnerability by building resilience to shocks and stresses. Although the gender-specific challenges of women's largely unequal involvement in agricultural activities are generally well-articulated, social protection policy and programming havenot adequately recognised the gendered experiences of poverty and vulnerability and the extent towhich gender inequality affects both social protection programme design and outcomes. To maximisethe linkages between social protection and agricultural growth, and to improve the effectiveness ofboth for reducing poverty and improving food security, it is imperative that gender-sensitive measures are integrated into policy and programme design and implementation. In this paper we focus on a subset of social protection programmes - public works schemes - which aim to tackle rural poverty andfood insecurity and/or promote agricultural productivity. We use two case studies of large public works programmes, i.e. the Productive Safety Net Programme (PSNP) in Ethiopia and the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) in India, to analyse the extent to which genderspecific risks and vulnerabilities are considered in programme design and implementation. Both programmes aim to support agricultural productivity and rural livelihoods through creating community agricultural assets and infrastructure and improving incomes for poor households. Our analysis revealed a number of important lessons which can be used to inform policy dialogues on public worksinitiatives in other contexts as well as highlighting some key policy areas in the design and implementation of public works programmes which can support a more positive impact on genderequality and public works programme effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmes, Rebecca & Jones, Nicola, 2011. "Gender inequality, risk and vulnerability in the rural economy. Refocusing the public works agenda to take account of economic and social risks," ESA Working Papers 289008, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:faoaes:289008
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289008/files/a-am318e.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saba Iqbal & Safia Nosheen, 2023. "Moderating impact of non-performing loans on the relationship between sustainable development goals and the financial performance of banks," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. World Bank, 2012. "Resilience, Equity, and Opportunity [Capacidad de recuperaciĆ³n, equidad y oportunidades]," World Bank Publications - Reports 12648, The World Bank Group.
    3. U. Chipfupa & E. Wale, 2020. "Linking earned income, psychological capital and social grant dependency: empirical evidence from rural KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) and implications for policy," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Kumar, Neha & Quisumbing, Agnes R., 2014. "Gender and resilience:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Fan, Shenggen & Pandya-Lorch, Rajul & Yosef, Sivan (ed.), 2013 Global Food Policy Report, chapter 17, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:faoaes:289008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faoooit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.