IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/capriw/42487.html

Initiatives For Rural Development Through Collective Action : The Case of Household Participation in Group Activities in the Highlands of Central Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Kariuki, Gatarwa
  • Place, Frank

Abstract

Dimensions of the nature, scope, and complexity of collective action in Kenya have evolved over many years. In studying collective action, the aim is to understand why and how people participate in networks of trust. The purpose of this study was to investigate the different objectives that farmers pursue through collective action with the aim of understanding the patterns of people’s participation in collective action, identify factors that influence people to join groups, and identify the costs and benefits of participating in activities of groups. The study was carried out in four sites spread across the highlands of central Kenya. Data was collected from a total of 442 households, focusing on whether members of those households belonged to groups and if so, what type of groups these were and their activities. In addition we looked at how these groups functioned and identified some of the contributions members make to these groups and the benefits from the same. The analysis shows that collective action is used to accomplish a range of activities for different socioeconomic categories and that the majority of households in central Kenya engage in some form of group activity. There are numerous active groups in central Kenya, most starting on their own initiative. They are very dynamic and take on many new activities often involving income generation. Gender has an influence on the nature of collective action. Findings suggest that men and women are engaged in similar group activities but the motivation for joining groups and extent of participation may be different. Men and women have different priorities which influence their decision to join groups. Access to markets and social insurance coping mechanisms are the main reason why men join groups while for women, social insurance and building household assets are the primary reasons why they join groups. Women are likely to engage significantly in subsistence agriculture while men are traditionally inclined towards the production of commercial enterprises through which they obtain their major source of income. Men will therefore be more interested in joining groups that have an element of commercialization and marketing. The study suggests that where institutions and policies that promote individual or private sector growth are weak, collective action can help to overcome these weaknesses and connect individuals in these institutions and policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kariuki, Gatarwa & Place, Frank, 2005. "Initiatives For Rural Development Through Collective Action : The Case of Household Participation in Group Activities in the Highlands of Central Kenya," CAPRi Working Papers 42487, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:capriw:42487
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42487/files/capriwp43.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42487?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:capriw:42487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.