IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aiea18/275657.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wild boar interaction with human activities : three years of investigations in Central Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Amici, A.
  • Coletta, A.
  • Primi, R.
  • Rossi, C. M.
  • Viola, P.

Abstract

The recent record of the number of wild ungulates in Italy shows that in some areas there is a deleterious animal density. Among the ungulates, the number of wild boars has been increasing considerably, during past decades in Italy as well as in many European countries; somewhere the number has reached the overabundance level, causing conflict between wild fauna and human activities. The implications of wild game overpopulation are manifold and mainly related to the sanitary risk and to the intensification of conflicts between agricultural practices and humans activities. As a consequence an increased compensation budget has to be allocated by local public authorities. Damages to agriculture, livestock and other economic activities catch the farmers’ attention and that of the local communities. Management authorities, however lack of an integrated approach, and often tend to adopt ex post reimbursement schemes without appropriate management plans. The wild boar population growth is likely to increase the number of requests for reimbursement that would make heavier the financial burden of public administrations up to a critical point. The present paper aims for a first definition of the potential damage. The value is assessed on the basis of a GIS definition of area where wild boars rest and on the potential damage to cultivations Outcomes will be of help for those actors involved in wild board management plans as well as for public authorities responsible for compensating wild fauna damages to human activities. Conclusions shall drive public actions in order to minimize wild boar negative effects on areas potentially affected by the highest rate of damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Amici, A. & Coletta, A. & Primi, R. & Rossi, C. M. & Viola, P., 2018. "Wild boar interaction with human activities : three years of investigations in Central Italy," 2018 Seventh AIEAA Conference, June 14-15, Conegliano, Italy 275657, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aiea18:275657
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275657/files/Coletta_WildBoar_CentralItaly_2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domenico Fulgione & Maria Buglione, 2022. "The Boar War: Five Hot Factors Unleashing Boar Expansion and Related Emergency," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Tommaso Fantechi & Caterina Contini & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Consumer preferences for wild game meat: evidence from a hybrid choice model on wild boar meat in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aiea18:275657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.