IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reconciling industry policy and comparative advantage: the regional distribution of China’s cattle and beef industry


  • Waldron, Scott A.
  • Brown, Colin G.


Much has been written in recent years on ‘local state corporatism’, centre-region relations, government and enterprise reform and on sustainable rural and agricultural development in China. Based on some of the theoretical underpinnings of this literature, and on extensive fieldwork in the full range of administrative levels, this paper presents an institutional approach to one Chinese rural industry. For a number of reasons, the Chinese cattle and beef industry serves as a highly revealing case study. While the industry only began developing along commercial lines in the 1990s, institutional forces have been instrumental, and perhaps more important than market forces, in forging the industry along its particular development path. The paper highlights the way by which institutions have affected particular development issues in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Waldron, Scott A. & Brown, Colin G., 2000. "Reconciling industry policy and comparative advantage: the regional distribution of China’s cattle and beef industry," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123736, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123736

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Waldron, Scott A., 1999. "Models of Agro-industrialisation in China: the Case of the Cattle and Beef Industry," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 125031, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare00:123736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.