IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea22/322170.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding Public Acceptability of Climate Policies in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shouyu
  • Ferreira, Susana
  • Karali, Berna

Abstract

Urgent and decisive government action to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions is more likely when the proposed measures are popular among the public. This paper compares the drivers of European public support for three alternative policies to combat climate change: carbon taxation, renewable energy subsidies, and minimum energy efficiency standards that apply to household appliances. We combine survey data with regional socio-economic and environmental indicators to provide a comprehensive, comparative analysis of policy acceptance that accounts for the geographic context in which these policies would be implemented. By comparing the drivers among three climate policies, we identify a rural-urban gap in predicting public perception of carbon taxation, which does not exist in the other policies. We also found a positive relationship between regional exposure to fine particular matter (PM2.5) and public support for climate policy, providing novel insights into the influence of environmental factors on public perceptions. This research highlights the importance of environmental and socio-economic context in predicting climate policy acceptance and offers valuable implications for policymakers seeking to garner public support for effective climate change mitigation strategies.PM2.5 exposure is positively related to European public support for renewable energy subsidies and minimum energy efficiency standards, but not with public support for carbon taxation.European governments need to increase public confidence in the political system to win public support for a carbon tax.A stronger macroeconomic situation, possibly by mitigating concerns about the economic costs of a carbon tax, is positively correlated to the public acceptability of carbon taxation.Rural residents, who are more dependent on fossil fuels and have higher electricity demands, are more likely to oppose increased fossil fuel taxes.Older people tend to favour minimum energy efficiency standards over other cl
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shouyu & Ferreira, Susana & Karali, Berna, 2022. "Understanding Public Acceptability of Climate Policies in Europe," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 322170, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea22:322170
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.322170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/322170/files/22711.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.322170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Endre Tvinnereim & Xiaozi Liu & Eric M. Jamelske, 2017. "Public perceptions of air pollution and climate change: different manifestations, similar causes, and concerns," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 399-412, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed M. Mostafa, 2023. "A one-hundred-year structural topic modeling analysis of the knowledge structure of international management research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3905-3935, August.
    2. Savin, Ivan & Drews, Stefan & van den Bergh, Jeroen, 2021. "Free associations of citizens and scientists with economic and green growth: A computational-linguistics analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Chia-Lee Yang & Chi-Yo Huang & Yi-Hao Hsiao, 2021. "Using Social Media Mining and PLS-SEM to Examine the Causal Relationship between Public Environmental Concerns and Adaptation Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Athanasios Lapatinas & Anastasia Litina & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2021. "The Impact of Economic Complexity on the Formation of Environmental Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Veronika Vaseková, 2022. "How do people in China perceive water? From health threat perception to environmental policy change," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 627-645, September.
    6. Aner Martinez-Soto & Emily Nix & Yarela Saldias-Lagos & Daniel Ignacio Sanhueza-Catalán, 2024. "Multiple Indicator Vulnerability to Energy Poverty: Assessing Spatial Variability Across Chile," World, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Abhishek Samantray & Paolo Pin, 2019. "Credibility of climate change denial in social media," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Barros, Murillo Vetroni & Salvador, Rodrigo & de Francisco, Antonio Carlos & Piekarski, Cassiano Moro, 2020. "Mapping of research lines on circular economy practices in agriculture: From waste to energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    9. Mosquera-Losada, M.R. & Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. & Rois-Díaz, M. & Moreno, G. & den Herder, M. & Aldrey-Vázquez, J.A. & Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. & Pantera, A. & Pisanelli, A. & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., 2018. "Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 603-613.
    10. Lapatinas, Athanasios & Litina, Anastasia & Zanaj, Skerdilajda, 2020. "Environmental Culture and Economic Complexity," MPRA Paper 105067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Ivan Savin & Kristina Chukavina & Andrey Pushkarev, 2023. "Topic-based classification and identification of global trends for startup companies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 659-689, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea22:322170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.