IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/234902.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Valuing Public Information in Agricultural Commodity Markets: WASDE Corn Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Abbott, Philip
  • Boussios, David
  • Lowenberg DeBoer, Jess

Abstract

Monthly WASDE reports by USDA estimate current and future global supply-utilization balances for various commodities, including corn. Existing literature has shown that markets respond to WASDE releases (news effects) but has not quantified the value or distribution of benefits from those reports. We use Monte Carlo simulations of a quarterly model of the U.S. corn market to estimate the value of the WASDE forecast and its components. Our results show significant value to market participants from the WASDE reports, roughly $301 million or 0.55% of overall corn market value. The results also show significant value for each forecasted component of the reports: area ($145 million), yield ($188 million), production ($299 million), demand/stocks ($300 million) and exports ($320 million). The benefits of each component do not strictly sum when new information is added because substantial redistribution of benefits occurs, since specific information components help specific interest groups. The expected benefits or losses realized by consumers, producers or traders is often nearly as large as (and sometimes larger than) the net benefits to society from better information. In the base case benefits from WASDE information largely accrues to producers ($153 million) and consumers ($341 million). Traders lose $192 million, as they are presumed to buy at harvest, before valuable demand, stocks and export data is known. Farmers behave as traders when they choose to store, sell forward, or participate directly in futures markets. Thus, the net trader benefit or loss accrues partially to farmers as traders and partially to commercial agents. These results are sensitive to elasticity assumptions that capture both how agents behave in markets and how their welfare is measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbott, Philip & Boussios, David & Lowenberg DeBoer, Jess, 2016. "Valuing Public Information in Agricultural Commodity Markets: WASDE Corn Reports," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 234902, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:234902
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.234902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234902/files/Valuing%20Public%20Information%20WASDE%20corn%20April%202016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.234902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sonia Marongiu & Barbara Bimbati & Mauro Santamgelo, 2021. "Use and users of FADN data in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-21.
    2. Christophe Gouel, 2020. "The Value of Public Information in Storable Commodity Markets: Application to the Soybean Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 846-865, May.
    3. Karali, Berna & Isengildina-Massa, Olga & Irwin, Scott H. & Adjemian, Michael K. & Johansson, Robert, 2019. "Are USDA reports still news to changing crop markets?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 66-76.
    4. Pierrick Piette, 2019. "Can Satellite Data Forecast Valuable Information from USDA Reports ? Evidences on Corn Yield Estimates," Working Papers hal-02149355, HAL.
    5. Rotem Zelingher, 2024. "Democratising Agricultural Commodity Price Forecasting: The AGRICAF Approach," Papers 2410.20363, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand and Price Analysis; Marketing;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:234902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.