IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/agd/wpaper/26-021.html

Do Investors React Differently to GHG Emission in Stock Pricing Across Firms? Evidence from Commonwealth African Countries using a Novel Wavelet-Enhanced QQR Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Idorenyin J. Okon

    (Ibadan, Nigeria)

  • Adeolu O. Adewuyi

    (Ibadan, Nigeria)

  • Simplice A. Asongu

    (Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

This study examines the intricate and asymmetric relationship between corporate Greenhouse Gas Emission disclosure and stock returns and crash risks, focusing on listed firms in six Commonwealth African countries characterized by regulatory fragility, limited investor protection, and growing climate vulnerability. Motivated by recent debates on carbon disclosure and financial valuation, we extended the Quantile-on-Quantile Regression (QQR) method to a novel Wavelet-Enhanced Multivariate QQR (WE-MQQR) approach and applied it to capture the full distributional dynamics of the corporate greenhouse gas emission disclosure and stock returns across quantiles and frequency domains. Using a balanced panel dataset of firm-level observations from 2012 to 2023, we assess whether the financial market penalizes, or rewards firms based on their environmental transparency via carbon disclosure behavior. The findings reveal a highly nonlinear and quantile-dependent relationship: firms with low disclosure levels are disproportionately penalized in the lower quantiles of stock returns, especially under adverse market conditions, while firms with consistent and high carbon transparency show positive valuation effects in moderate-to-high return quantiles. For robustness, comparative analysis with baseline QQR models underscores the superiority of the WE-MQQR approach in capturing nonlinear, asymmetric, time-scale and country heterogeneity. Further analysis focusing on stock price crash risk also confirms the original findings, showing that firms with high emission exposure also face heightened crash risks, particularly in the upper quantiles of the crash risk distribution. These results provide robust empirical insights useful for climate finance policy, carbon risk pricing, and disclosure regulations in Africa's emerging capital markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Idorenyin J. Okon & Adeolu O. Adewuyi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2026. "Do Investors React Differently to GHG Emission in Stock Pricing Across Firms? Evidence from Commonwealth African Countries using a Novel Wavelet-Enhanced QQR Approach," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 26/021, African Governance and Development Institute..
  • Handle: RePEc:agd:wpaper:26/021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afridev.org/RePEc/agd/agd-wpaper/21.Do-Investors-React-Differently-to-GHG-Emission-in-Stock-Pricing-Across-Firms-Evidence-from-Commonwealth-African-Countries-using-a-Novel-Wavelet-Enhanced-QQR-Approach.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O55 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Africa
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agd:wpaper:26/021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Asongu Simplice (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agdiycm.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.