IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adv/wpaper/201906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Natural gas pricing GSA Bolivia – Brazil using virtual hub and expected monetary value instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge L. Gumucio

    (Consultor Privado)

  • Sergio M. Medinaceli

    (Consultor Privado)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the shortcomings of incentive policies, specifically competitiveness, if they are designed without considering fundamentals of market development such as, level of demand, level of investment, and availability of alternative sources of supply. We focus on the analysis of the main market, financial, and economic variables in the Bolivia-Brazil Gas Supply Agreement, their relationship, development and dynamics through time and the current situation before the contract is renegotiated in 2019. Our analysis centers on the effective negotiation margin that Bolivia has calculated from the overall production costs of Bolivian gas (using EMV) vis a vis the opportunity cost of Brazil importing LNG. Using 10%-15% as discount rates and WTI prices between $50 and $60/bbl, the natural gas price result of EMV is between $ 4.96 and $ 7.99/MMbtu. Using the Bolivian tax incentive gas price should be between $2.29 and $5.16/MMbtu. Under the assumptions that WTI levels would be around $ 60/bbl, investors use a 15% discount rate to invest in Bolivia, incentive policy is in place, and the price of LNG is around $ 6.84/MMbtu; the opportunity cost of Brazil importing gas from Bolivia is $ -0.55/MMbtu. The same case without incentive policy will yield a $ -3.38/MMbtu. On the other hand, if the transport tariff is reduced the margin becomes positive under the assumption that the incentive policy is still in place. Therefore, as the price of LNG becomes more competitive through increase in supply (worldwide), Brazil will set its negotiation position around the price that they could import LNG on the short to medium term

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge L. Gumucio & Sergio M. Medinaceli, 2019. "Natural gas pricing GSA Bolivia – Brazil using virtual hub and expected monetary value instruments," Development Research Working Paper Series 06/2019, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:201906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inesad.edu.bo/pdf/wp2019/wp06_2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaiser, Mark J., 2007. "Fiscal system analysis—concessionary systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2135-2147.
    2. Peter L. Law & Nelson de Franco, 1998. "International Gas Trade : The Bolivia-Brazil Gas Pipeline," World Bank Publications - Reports 11546, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel E. Okoro & Lawrence U. Okoye & Ikechukwu S. Okafor & Tamunotonjo Obomanu & Ngozi Adeleye, 2021. "Impact of Production Sharing Contract Price Sliding Royalty: The case of Nigeria s Deepwater Operation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 261-268.
    2. Wint Thiri Swe & Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi, 2018. "Assessment of Upstream Petroleum Fiscal Regimes in Myanmar," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Netback prices; GSA; Gas Pricing; Gas Contract Negotiation; Virtual Hub; Expected Monetary Value.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q31 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • Q35 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Hydrocarbon Resources
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:201906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lykke Andersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inesabo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.