IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aap/wpaper/149.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Co-Authorship Recognition Antecedents: the Brazilian research community case

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Kirschbaum
  • André Mascarenhas
  • Felipe Zambaldi
  • Suzane Strehlau

Abstract

The present paper explores the antecedents of co-authorship recognition in the Brazilian community of business administration research. Confronted with schematic vignettes encompassing varying levels of ambiguous and power-asymmetric situations, respondents exposed their positioning vis-à -vis co-authorship. Respondents identified the Brazilian community as favoring extrinsic exchanges (i.e., recognition is granted independently from effort invested in the research itself) even at situations where there was neither ambiguity that low effort was invested by the benefitting parties, nor power-asymmetric relationships. In contrast, individuals’ beliefs leaned towards intrinsic exchanges, with mixed results at low-ambiguity and high power asymmetric relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Kirschbaum & André Mascarenhas & Felipe Zambaldi & Suzane Strehlau, 2012. "Co-Authorship Recognition Antecedents: the Brazilian research community case," Business and Economics Working Papers 149, Unidade de Negocios e Economia, Insper.
    • Handle: RePEc:aap:wpaper:149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repositorio.insper.edu.br/server/api/core/bitstreams/997c181b-6805-481c-8884-00cda52f13f7/content?authentication-token=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJlaWQiOiIwNmRmYmM2MS1iNGQ1LTQ1YzgtYjlmNS1lYTk1ZDQwYTIwNzkiLCJzZyI6W10sImF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uTWV0aG9kIjoicGFzc3dvcmQiLCJleHAiOjE3NDA1OTgyMjF9.oWmI32_YzpyVOAMPAd_mdzEFFlmK9tExiNCePDB5L4I
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aap:wpaper:149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca Telles (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inspebr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.