IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/hiclch/249616.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Framework for indicator-based, sociotechnical project risk monitoring

In: Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 31

Author

Listed:
  • Gauß, Philipp
  • Parlings, Matthias

Abstract

Purpose: Many Industry 4.0 projects fail because impending sociotechnical risks are managed insufficiently. An indicator-based, sociotechnical risk monitoring can help to overcome this challenge. However, its effectiveness depends significantly on selecting appropriate risk indicators. This paper outlines a framework that helps decision-makers with the necessary structuring, allowing for subsequent indicator definition. Methodology: Indicators must be embedded in specific contexts to be meaningful. The design of indicator-based monitoring systems, therefore, first requires an appropriate framework. For this purpose, specific requirements related to digitization projects are derived from both literature and practitioners' needs. Findings: Risks in the context of Industry 4.0 projects are systemic risks. For efficient monitoring, new approaches are needed that can manage this high complexity. Systems theory is found suitable to develop a new framework for indicator-based, sociotechnical project risk monitoring. The framework considers the characteristics of projects and enterprises as complex, open, and sociotechnical systems. Originality: Especially in complex projects like those of Industry 4.0, situational risk awareness can contribute crucially to project success. However, achieving this awareness always requires tailored approaches addressing the unique project characteristics. To help solve this challenge for digitization projects, the proposed framework sets both a science-based and practitioner-relevant foundation for subsequent derivation of sociotechnical risk indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Gauß, Philipp & Parlings, Matthias, 2021. "Framework for indicator-based, sociotechnical project risk monitoring," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 185-218, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:249616
    DOI: 10.15480/882.3968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/249616/1/hicl-2021-31-185.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15480/882.3968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hendrik S. Birkel & Johannes W. Veile & Julian M. Müller & Evi Hartmann & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Development of a Risk Framework for Industry 4.0 in the Context of Sustainability for Established Manufacturers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Donnelly, Oisin & Sar, Kubra & Wang, Chao & Azadnia, Amir Hossein, 2022. "The successful implementation of industry 4.0 in manufacturing: An analysis and prioritization of risks in Irish industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Artur Pollak & Agata Hilarowicz & Maciej Walczak & Damian Gąsiorek, 2020. "A Framework of Action for Implementation of Industry 4.0. an Empirically Based Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. Nikola Soukupová & Markéta Adamová & Růžena Krninská, 2020. "Industry 4.0: an Employee Perception (Case of the Czech Republic)," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 637-644.
    6. Barbara Aquilani & Michela Piccarozzi & Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini, 2020. "The Role of Open Innovation and Value Co-creation in the Challenging Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0: Toward a Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Zimei Liu & Kefan Xie & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2020. "A paradigm of safety management in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 632-645, July.
    8. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska, 2021. "The Concept of Cyber-Physical Networks of Small and Medium Enterprises under Personalized Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Yang, Miying & Fu, Mingtao & Zhang, Zihan, 2021. "The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: Drivers, process and impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo & Edgar Santoyo & Esther O. García-Mandujano & Holkan Vázquez-Sánchez, 2023. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Sebastian Saniuk & Sandra Grabowska & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Personalization of Products in the Industry 4.0 Concept and Its Impact on Achieving a Higher Level of Sustainable Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca & Büchi, Giacomo, 2021. "Openness to Industry 4.0 and performance: The impact of barriers and incentives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Muawia Ramadan & Tariq Amer & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "The Impact of Integration of Industry 4.0 and Internal Organizational Forces on Sustaining Competitive Advantages and Achieving Strategic Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    15. Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Narula, Sanjiv & Audretsch, David & Puppala, Harish & Kumar, Anil, 2022. "Adopting new technology is a distant dream? The risks of implementing Industry 4.0 in emerging economy SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Ewa Stawiarska & Danuta Szwajca & Mirosław Matusek & Radosław Wolniak, 2021. "Diagnosis of the Maturity Level of Implementing Industry 4.0 Solutions in Selected Functional Areas of Management of Automotive Companies in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-38, April.
    17. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    18. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    19. Mohamed Fathy Agina & Nadir Aliane & Osman El Sawy & Hazem Ahmed Khairy & Sameh Fayyad, 2023. "Risks in Relation to Adopting Airbnb Accommodation: The Role of Fear of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Fernando E. García-Muiña & María Sonia Medina-Salgado & Anna Maria Ferrari & Marco Cucchi, 2020. "Sustainability Transition in Industry 4.0 and Smart Manufacturing with the Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Advanced Manufacturing; Industry 4.0;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hiclch:249616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hicl.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.