IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spochp/978-0-387-77247-9_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Strategic Audit Policies Without Commitment

In: Pareto Optimality, Game Theory And Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Kalyan Chatterjee

    (The Pennsylvania State University)

  • Sanford Morton

    (Private Consultant)

  • Arijit Mukherji

    (Private Consultant)

Abstract

This chapter constructs and analyzes a simple auditing model in order to answer questions concerning three principal issues: (i) the information contained in the report, (ii) commitment to the audit policy, and (iii) audit effort. The approach taken is based on the concept of perfect Bayesian equilibrium. We attempt to examine the nature of such equilibria and arguments as to which equilibrium one would expect to observe.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalyan Chatterjee & Sanford Morton & Arijit Mukherji, 2008. "Strategic Audit Policies Without Commitment," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Altannar Chinchuluun & Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasios Migdalas & Leonidas Pitsoulis (ed.), Pareto Optimality, Game Theory And Equilibria, pages 407-436, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-0-387-77247-9_15
    DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77247-9_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Pollrich, 2017. "Mediated audits," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 48(1), pages 44-68, March.
    2. Andrew Yim, 2009. "Efficient Committed Budget for Implementing Target Audit Probability for Many Inspectees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 2000-2018, December.
    3. Heiko Gerlach, 2013. "Self-Reporting, Investigation, and Evidentiary Standards," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 1061-1090.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spochp:978-0-387-77247-9_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.