IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/isochp/978-1-4899-7684-0_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Sustainable Product Design Performance Evaluation with Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis

In: Data Envelopment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chialin Chen

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Joe Zhu

    (Nanjing Audit University
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute)

  • Jiun-Yu Yu

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Hamid Noori

    (Wilfrid Laurier University)

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has traditionally been used to measure the performance of production systems in terms of efficiency in converting inputs into outputs. In this paper, we present a novel use of the two-stage network DEA to evaluate the sustainable product design performances. While sustainable product design has been considered as one of the most important practices for achieving sustainability, one challenge faced by decision makers in both the private and public sectors is how to deal with the difficult technical trade-offs between traditional and environmental attributes which require new design concepts and engineering specifications. To deal with this challenge, we conceptualize “design efficiency” as a key measurement of design performance in terms of how well multiple product specifications and attributes are combined in a product design that leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. A two-stage network DEA model is developed for sustainable design performance evaluation with an “industrial design module” and a “bio design module.” To demonstrate the applications of our DEA-based methodology, we use data of key engineering specifications, product attributes, and emissions performances in the vehicle emissions testing database published by the U.S. EPA to evaluate the sustainable design performances of different automobile manufacturers. Our test results show that sustainable design does not need to mean compromise between traditional and environmental attributes. Through addressing the interrelatedness of subsystems in product design, a firm can find the most efficient way to combine product specifications and attributes which leads to lower environmental impacts or better environmental performances. We also demonstrate how two-stage network DEA can be used to develop a analytical framework for evaluating sustainable design performances as well as to identify the most eco-efficient way to achieve better environmental performances through product design.

Suggested Citation

  • Chialin Chen & Joe Zhu & Jiun-Yu Yu & Hamid Noori, 2016. "Sustainable Product Design Performance Evaluation with Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 317-344, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4899-7684-0_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7684-0_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radovanović, Sandro & Savić, Gordana & Delibašić, Boris & Suknović, Milija, 2022. "FairDEA—Removing disparate impact from efficiency scores," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1088-1098.
    2. Jain, Tarun & Hazra, Jishnu, 2020. "Optimal regulation and sustainable product design under uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:isochp:978-1-4899-7684-0_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.