IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Impact measurement revised: Evaluating the Impact of the Lifelong Learning Programme in Slovenia

Listed author(s):
  • Klemen Sirok

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

  • Gregor Petric

    (University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Registered author(s):

    European Union programmes in the field of education and training demand regular evaluation. However, due to several conceptual and measurement issues, the validity of evaluation results is put into question. The paper proposes to assess the programmes from a refined perspective of impact, calling for the clarification of some key methodological issues. Two groups of problems for the validity of evaluation research in the field of educational programmes are identified, one referring to causality and the second to the absence of proper conceptualisation and operationalisation. The case of LLP impact evaluation in Slovenia is used to present solutions to the outlined problems.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: full text in English
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: Conference Programme with Abstracts
    Download Restriction: no

    in new window

    This chapter was published in: Klemen Sirok & Gregor Petric , , pages 1035-1063, 2011.
    This item is provided by University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper in its series MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers] with number 1035-1063.
    Handle: RePEc:mgt:micp11:1035-1063
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Cankarjeva 5, SI-6104 Koper, PO BOX 345

    Phone: 05 610 20 00
    Fax: 05 610 20 15
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Andrew Leigh, 2009. "What evidence should social policymakers use?," Economic Roundup, The Treasury, Australian Government, issue 1, pages 27-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:micp11:1035-1063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen Jezovnik)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.