IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/hoo/bookch/8-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Single Point of Entry and the Bankruptcy Alternative

In: Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Skeel Jr.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Skeel Jr., 2014. "Single Point of Entry and the Bankruptcy Alternative," Book Chapters, in: Martin Neil Baily & John B. Taylor (ed.), Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis, chapter 15, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
  • Handle: RePEc:hoo:bookch:8-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/across-the-great-divide-ch15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Bolton & Martin Oehmke, 2019. "Bank Resolution and the Structure of Global Banks," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(6), pages 2384-2421.
    2. Kupiec, Paul & Wallison, Peter, 2015. "Can the “Single Point of Entry” strategy be used to recapitalize a systemically important failing bank?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 184-197.
    3. Mitchell Berlin, 2015. "New rules for foreign banks: what's at stake?," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Q1, pages 1-10.
    4. Bolton, Patrick & Oehmke, Martin, 2018. "Bank resolution and the structure of global banks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118937, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Bolton, Patrick & Oehmke, Martin, 2019. "Bank resolution and the structure of global banks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90056, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Bolton, Patrick & Oehmke, Martin, 2018. "Bank Resolution and the Structure of Global Banks," CEPR Discussion Papers 13032, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Goodhart, Charles & Avgouleas, Emilios, 2014. "A Critical Evaluation of Bail-in as a Bank Recapitalisation Mechanism," CEPR Discussion Papers 10065, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. José Alejandro Fernández Fernández, 2020. "Considerations of the SPE and MPE resolution," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 278-287, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hoo:bookch:8-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hostaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.