Why Europe has to offer a better deal towards its Muslim communities. A quantitative analysis of open international data
Our rigorous quantitative results, based on the first systematic use of the Muslim community data contained in the "European Social Survey" (ESS), compatible with much of the rest of current European political economic thinking regarding the future alternatives for the European Union, and contradict the very extended current alarmist political discourse in Western Europe. Those give strong support to the hypothesis that passive support for Islamist radicalism in Europe and the complete distrust in democracy does not exceed 400.000 persons. We also compare our research results with the recent PEW data. By and large, the two datasets yield the same results. We also find that Muslim economic and social alienation in Europe very much corresponds to deficiencies of the implementation of the "Lisbon" process. We also present a rigorous re-analysis of United States Department of State data on acts of global terrorism in the framework of Kondratiev cycle waves. Further dispelling irrational immigration-phobias and Islamophobia in general, the present work also shows that, by and large, pretty much the same functions of key (positive or negative) UNDP development indicators (y-axis) hold in comparison with purchasing power per capita (x-axis) in the Muslim world and the non-Muslim countries.
This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
- World Values Survey in Wikipedia Dutch ne '')
- Islam en France in Wikipedia French ne '')
- Chủ nghĩa Hồi giáo in Wikipedia Vietnamese ne '')
- Islam en Francia in Wikipedia Spanish ne '')
- Іслам у Європі in Wikipedia Ukranian ne '')
- Islamismo in Wikipedia Spanish ne '')
- Islam in Wikipedia Polish ne '')
- Encuesta Mundial de Valores in Wikipedia Spanish ne '')
- Islamismo na Europa in Wikipedia Portuguese ne '')
- 世界価値観調査 in Wikipedia Japanese ne '')
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erv:ebooks:b001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rafael Gómez Sánchez)or (Lisette Villamizar)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.