IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/214053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What kind of cyber security? Theorising cyber security and mapping approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Fichtner, Laura

Abstract

Building on conceptual work on security and cyber security, the paper explores how different approaches to cyber security are constructed. It outlines structural components and presents four common approaches. Each of them suggests a different role for the actors involved and is motivated and justified by different values such as privacy, economic order and national security. When a cyber security policy or initiative is chosen by policymakers, the analysis of the underlying approach enhances our understanding of how this shapes relationships between actors and of the values prioritised, promoted and inscribed into the concerned technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Fichtner, Laura, 2018. "What kind of cyber security? Theorising cyber security and mapping approaches," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214053
    DOI: 10.14763/2018.2.788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214053/1/IntPolRev-2018-2-788.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2018.2.788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hofmann, Jeanette & Katzenbach, Christian & Gollatz, Kirsten, 2017. "Between coordination and regulation: Finding the governance in Internet governance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(9), pages 1406-1423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofmann, Jeanette & Kersting, Norbert & Ritzi, Claudia & Schünemann, Wolf J., 2019. "Politikwissenschaft und die digitale Gesellschaft," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 9-23.
    2. Allan McConnell & Paul ’t Hart, 2019. "Inaction and public policy: understanding why policymakers ‘do nothing’," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 645-661, December.
    3. Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-60.
    4. Hasselbalch, Gry, 2019. "Making sense of data ethics. The powers behind the data ethics debate in European policymaking," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19.
    5. Ulbricht, Lena, 2020. "Algorithmen und Politisierung [Algorithms and politicization]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 0, pages 255-278.
    6. Max Grafenstein & Alina Wernick & Christopher Olk, 2019. "Data Governance: Enhancing Innovation and Protecting Against Its Risks," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 54(4), pages 228-232, July.
    7. Badouard, Romain & Mabi, Clément & Sire, Guillaume, 2016. "Beyond "Points of Control": logics of digital governmentality," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13.
    8. Palladino, Nicola, 2021. "The role of epistemic communities in the “constitutionalization” of internet governance: The example of the European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.