IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/271207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalisation in everyday urban planning activities: Consequences for embodied practices, spatial knowledge, planning processes, and workplaces

Author

Listed:
  • Christmann, Gabriela
  • Schinagl, Martin

Abstract

The article deals with the digitalisation of planning from a sociological perspective. The authors summarise results of their international empirical research in an analysis in which they place everyday digital planning practices at the centre of their considerations, where profound and intricate affects in planning occur at the level of embodied practices, spatial knowledge, planning processes, and workplaces. The authors examine the use of digital tools at different study sites and particularly discuss how the digitalisation of planners’ actions through the use of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) programmes affects the way spaces are planned and how spatial knowledge is changing through the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). What is striking is that on the basis of digital practices, the relationships between planning actors are being refigured insofar as planning teams often work not only locally but at the same time globally networked and thus plan translocally. This refiguration through digitalisation (Knoblauch & Löw, 2020) in its social and spatial dimensions is also reflected in the design of workplaces (including the layouts of planning offices) as is shown in the article. Finally, it is outlined that risks and potentials for planning products are unfolding today through phenomena such as the digital datafication of spatial realities and translocal planning by the globally distributed members of planning teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Christmann, Gabriela & Schinagl, Martin, 2023. "Digitalisation in everyday urban planning activities: Consequences for embodied practices, spatial knowledge, planning processes, and workplaces," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 141-150.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:271207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jum.2023.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/271207/1/1-s2.0-S2226585623000055-main.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jum.2023.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enzo Falco & Reinout Kleinhans, 2018. "Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 52-79, July.
    2. Sophie Mélix & Gabriela Christmann, 2022. "Rendering Affective Atmospheres: The Visual Construction of Spatial Knowledge About Urban Development Projects," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 299-310.
    3. Li Yin & Narushige Shiode, 2014. "3D spatial-temporal GIS modeling of urban environments to support design and planning processes," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 152-169, June.
    4. Mélix, Sophie & Christmann, Gabriela, 2022. "Rendering Affective Atmospheres: The Visual Construction of Spatial Knowledge About Urban Development Projects," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 299-310.
    5. Stan Geertman & John Stillwell, 2020. "Planning support science: Developments and challenges," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1326-1342, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marina Jovanovic-Milenkovic & Filip Petrovic, 2023. "The Impact of Digitization on the Formation of a New Model for Geospatial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanliu Lin & Kasper Benneker, 2022. "Assessing collaborative planning and the added value of planning support apps in The Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 391-410, February.
    2. Daphna Levine & Shai Sussman & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2022. "Spatial-temporal patterns of self-organization: A dynamic 4D model for redeveloping the post-zoning city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1005-1023, March.
    3. Haozhi Pan & Stan Geertman & Brian Deal, 2020. "What does urban informatics add to planning support technology?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1317-1325, October.
    4. Mohamed Sapraz & Shengnan Han, 2021. "Implicating Human Values for designing a Digital Government Collaborative Platform for Environmental Issues: A Value Sensitive Design Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Dina Margrethe Aspen & Andreas Amundsen, 2021. "Developing a Participatory Planning Support System for Sustainable Regional Planning—A Problem Structuring Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Ha, Seungyeon & Park, Yujun & Kim, Jongpyo & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Research trends of digital platforms: A survey of the literature from 2018 to 2021," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    7. Töppel, Mandy & Reichel, Christian, 2021. "Qualitative Methods and Hybrid Maps for Spatial Perception with an Example of Security Perception," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119.
    8. González, Ainhoa & Connell, Peter, 2022. "Developing a renewable energy planning decision-support tool: Stakeholder input guiding strategic decisions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    9. Vít Pászto & Jiří Pánek & Jaroslav Burian, 2021. "Geodatabase of Publicly Available Information about Czech Municipalities’ Local Administration," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Tim Johansson & Eugenia Segerstedt & Thomas Olofsson & Mats Jakobsson, 2016. "Revealing Social Values by 3D City Visualization in City Transformations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:271207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.