IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i2p384-400.html

A visibility-based approach to manage the vertical urban development and maintain visual sustainability of urban mountain landscapes: A case of Mufu Mountain in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guanting Zhang
  • Shi Cheng
  • Yuan Gao

Abstract

China has experienced a continuous population increase in urban areas over the last few decades with limited land for construction, which has prompted upward growth in the urban environment. Rapid urbanization has encroached on mountain landscapes and deteriorated the visual landscape in different parts of China. This study aims to investigate and analyze the proper balance between visual landscape protection of urban mountains and vertical urban development using a visibility-based method. An interactive and quantitative method was developed in this research using multiple digital 2D and 3D platforms based on the specification of prohibited spaces for constructive expansion in building height control. A metropolitan area near Mufu Mountain in Nanjing, China, was selected as a case study to implement the proposed method and simulate multiple vertical urban development scenarios. According to the comparison of different scenarios, there is a better building height layout to simultaneously satisfy the requirement of sustaining the Mufu mountain’s visibility and the construction capacity proposed by the documented plan. Two polynomial models were generated to quantitatively investigate the relationship between the protection of mountain landscapes and vertical urban development and served as a reference basis for urban planners to formulate the construction volume control strategy around Mufu Mountain. The proposed method in this study can help planners and urban managers to seek an appropriate approach to control building heights and achieve visual sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanting Zhang & Shi Cheng & Yuan Gao, 2024. "A visibility-based approach to manage the vertical urban development and maintain visual sustainability of urban mountain landscapes: A case of Mufu Mountain in Nanjing, China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(2), pages 384-400, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:384-400
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231177058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231177058
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231177058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcus R. White & Nano Langenheim, 2018. "A Spatio-Temporal Decision Support System for Designing With Street Trees," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Bieling, Claudia & Plieninger, Tobias & Pirker, Heidemarie & Vogl, Christian R., 2014. "Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-30.
    3. Daniele Ehrlich & Michele Melchiorri & Claudia Capitani, 2021. "Population Trends and Urbanisation in Mountain Ranges of the World," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Erfu Dai & Yahui Wang & Liang Ma & Le Yin & Zhuo Wu, 2018. "‘Urban-Rural’ Gradient Analysis of Landscape Changes around Cities in Mountainous Regions: A Case Study of the Hengduan Mountain Region in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    5. Bjørn Grinde & Grete Grindal Patil, 2009. "Biophilia: Does Visual Contact with Nature Impact on Health and Well-Being?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Li Yin & Narushige Shiode, 2014. "3D spatial-temporal GIS modeling of urban environments to support design and planning processes," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 152-169, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunju Jo & Chorong Song & Yoshifumi Miyazaki, 2019. "Physiological Benefits of Viewing Nature: A Systematic Review of Indoor Experiments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Kurt Beil & Douglas Hanes, 2013. "The Influence of Urban Natural and Built Environments on Physiological and Psychological Measures of Stress— A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Raymond, Christopher M. & Kenter, Jasper O. & Plieninger, Tobias & Turner, Nancy J. & Alexander, Karen A., 2014. "Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 145-156.
    4. Jiayi Jiang & Zhengwei Xia & Xiaodi Sun & Xuanxuan Wang & Shixian Luo, 2022. "Social Infrastructure and Street Networks as Critical Infrastructure for Aging Friendly Community Design: Mediating the Effect of Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Kamila Czepczor-Bernat & Justyna Modrzejewska & Adriana Modrzejewska & Viren Swami, 2022. "The Impact of a Woodland Walk on Body Image: A Field Experiment and an Assessment of Dispositional and Environmental Determinants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Yuchen Zhou & Qingxu Huang & Chunyang He & Peiyuan Chen & Dan Yin & Yihan Zhou & Yansong Bai, 2025. "A bibliographic review of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(11), pages 25965-25992, November.
    7. Karimi, Azadeh & Yazdandad, Hossein & Fagerholm, Nora, 2020. "Evaluating social perceptions of ecosystem services, biodiversity, and land management: Trade-offs, synergies and implications for landscape planning and management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    8. Junfang Xie & Binyi Liu & Mohamed Elsadek, 2021. "How Can Flowers and Their Colors Promote Individuals’ Physiological and Psychological States during the COVID-19 Lockdown?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    9. Janjira Sukwai & Nobuo Mishima & Nattasit Srinurak, 2022. "Balancing Cultural Heritage Conservation: Visual Integrity Assessment to Support Change Management in the Buffer Zone of Chiang Mai Historic City Using GIS and Computer-Generated 3D Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-27, April.
    10. Mahbubur Meenar & Megan Heckert & Deepti Adlakha, 2022. "“Green Enough Ain’t Good Enough:” Public Perceptions and Emotions Related to Green Infrastructure in Environmental Justice Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Ferdinando Fornara & Elena Rinallo & Massimiliano Scopelliti, 2023. "Contact with Nature in Social Deprivation during COVID-19: The Positive Impact on Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Linjia Wu & Qidi Dong & Shixian Luo & Wenyuan Jiang & Ming Hao & Qibing Chen, 2021. "Effects of Spatial Elements of Urban Landscape Forests on the Restoration Potential and Preference of Adolescents," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Minjung Cho, 2023. "Evaluating Therapeutic Healthcare Environmental Criteria: Architectural Designers’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-34, January.
    14. Jacobs, Sander & Dendoncker, Nicolas & Martín-López, Berta & Barton, David Nicholas & Gomez-Baggethun, Erik & Boeraeve, Fanny & McGrath, Francesca L. & Vierikko, Kati & Geneletti, Davide & Sevecke, Ka, 2016. "A new valuation school: Integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 213-220.
    15. Daniel Shepherd & David Welch & Kim N. Dirks & David McBride, 2013. "Do Quiet Areas Afford Greater Health-Related Quality of Life than Noisy Areas?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Ionut Marius Croitoru & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2024. "Rural Tourism in Mountain Rural Comunities-Possible Direction/Strategies: Case Study Mountain Area from Bihor County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Adison Altamirano & Carolina Gonzalez-Suhr & Caroline Marien & Germán Catalán & Alejandro Miranda & Marco Prado & Laurent Tits & Lorena Vieli & Paula Meli, 2020. "Landscape Disturbance Gradients: The Importance of the Type of Scene When Evaluating Landscape Preferences and Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Jürgen Schmude & Markus Pillmayer & Maximilian Witting & Philipp Corradini, 2021. "Geography Matters, But… Evolving Success Factors for Nature-Oriented Health Tourism within Selected Alpine Destinations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Mandy Töppel & Christian Reichel, 2021. "Qualitative Methods and Hybrid Maps for Spatial Perception with an Example of Security Perception," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119.
    20. Mandy Töppel & Christian Reichel, 2021. "Qualitative Methods and Hybrid Maps for Spatial Perception with an Example of Security Perception," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 105-119.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:2:p:384-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.