IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/205808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Better Measures of Neighbourhood Characteristics and Change for Use in Studies of Residential Mobility: A Case Study of Britain in the Early 2000s

Author

Listed:
  • Gambaro, Ludovica
  • Joshi, Heather
  • Lupton, Ruth
  • Fenton, Alex
  • Lennon, Mary Clare

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of measuring neighbourhood characteristics and change when working with individual level datasets to understand the effects of residential mobility. Currently available measures in Britain are in various respects unsuitable for this purpose. The paper explores a new indicator of small area poverty: the Unadjusted Means-tested Benefits Rate (UMBR), which divides claimants of means-tested benefits in a small area by the number of households. We describe changes in area poverty between 2001 and 2006, using UMBR. As often assumed, these are generally negligible, but small areas in ``disadvantaged urban'' and ``multicultural city life'' communities did change considerably in this period. We also link UMBR to the first three waves of the UK Millennium Cohort Study, a survey of families with children born at the beginning of the 2000s. We examine opinions about neighbourhood and find that parents living in areas of higher poverty did tend to express more negative views than those living elsewhere. Living in high poverty areas was also associated with moving home, and those families who retrospectively gave neighbourhood considerations as reasons for moving did move into areas with markedly lower poverty rates. Finally, we compare families' moving trajectories to trends in poverty within areas. We are able to show that a large proportion of families who moved to poorer neighbourhoods were at double disadvantage, as they often moved to areas with increasing poverty rates. We conclude that UMBR can be used to enhance understanding of changing neighbourhood contexts in cohort studies, at least for this period, although it still suffers from the same conceptual and technical difficulties as other available alternatives in terms of its ability to capture aspects of neighbourhood quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Gambaro, Ludovica & Joshi, Heather & Lupton, Ruth & Fenton, Alex & Lennon, Mary Clare, 2016. "Developing Better Measures of Neighbourhood Characteristics and Change for Use in Studies of Residential Mobility: A Case Study of Britain in the Early 2000s," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 569-590.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:205808
    DOI: 10.1007/s12061-015-9164-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/205808/1/Gambaro2016_Article_DevelopingBetterMeasuresOfNeig.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12061-015-9164-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cep:sticas:/173 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Alex Fenton, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 01, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. Tim Butler, 2007. "Re‐urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, Suburbanization or New Urbanism?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 759-781, December.
    4. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51269, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Fenton, Alex, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 58053, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Alex Fenton, 2013. "Small-area measures of income poverty," CASE Papers case173, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Serra & Sophia Psarra & Jamie O'Brien, 2018. "Social and Physical Characterization of Urban Contexts: Techniques and Methods for Quantification, Classification and Purposive Sampling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 58-74.
    2. Serena Pattaro & Nick Bailey & Chris Dibben, 2020. "Using Linked Longitudinal Administrative Data to Identify Social Disadvantage," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 865-895, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil Lee & Paul Sissons, 2016. "Inclusive growth? The relationship between economic growth and poverty in British cities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(11), pages 2317-2339, November.
    2. repec:cep:spccrr:06 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:cep:spccrr:03 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gambaro, Ludovica & Joshi, Heather E. & Lupton, Ruth, 2017. "Moving to a better place? Residential mobility among families with young children in the Millennium Cohort Study," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23, pages 1-14.
    5. Ferguson, Neil T.N. & Michaelsen, Maren M., 2015. "Money changes everything? Education and regional deprivation revisited," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 129-147.
    6. Laurence Troy, 2018. "The politics of urban renewal in Sydney’s residential apartment market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1329-1345, May.
    7. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    8. Thierry Theurillat & Patrick Rérat & Olivier Crevoisier, 2015. "The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(8), pages 1414-1433, June.
    9. Zühal Özbay Daş & Gülşah Özşahin, 2021. "An empirical analysis of gentrification in Istanbul," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 501-526, June.
    10. Mehrdad Chahardowli & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Farshid Aram & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Nadine Marquardt & Henning Füller & Georg Glasze & Robert Pütz, 2013. "Shaping the Urban Renaissance: New-build Luxury Developments in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(8), pages 1540-1556, June.
    12. Emine Yetiskul & Sule Demirel, 2018. "Assembling gentrification in Istanbul: The Cihangir neighbourhood of BeyoÄŸlu," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3336-3352, November.
    13. Yang Shen, 2015. "Why Does the Government Fail to Improve the Living Conditions of Migrant Workers in Shanghai? Reflections on the Policies and the Implementations of Public Rental Housing under Neoliberalism," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 58-74, January.
    14. Luca Salvati & Pere Serra & Massimiliano Bencardino & Margherita Carlucci, 2019. "Re-urbanizing the European City: A Multivariate Analysis of Population Dynamics During Expansion and Recession Times," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Raszeja Elżbieta & Badach Joanna, 2018. "Urban space recovery. Landscape-beneficial solutions in new estates built in post-industrial and post-military areas in Bristol, Poznań and Gdańsk," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 22(4), pages 210-218, December.
    16. Sandrine Jean, 2016. "Neighbourhood attachment revisited: Middle-class families in the Montreal metropolitan region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(12), pages 2567-2583, September.
    17. Xiaobo Su, 2015. "Urban entrepreneurialism and the commodification of heritage in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2874-2889, November.
    18. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Scripting Indian and Chinese urban spatial transformation: Adding new narratives to gentrification and suburbanisation research," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 980-997, September.
    19. Michael Janoschka & Jorge Sequera & Luis Salinas, 2014. "Gentrification in Spain and Latin America — a Critical Dialogue," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1234-1265, July.
    20. Seth A. Williams & John R. Hipp, 2022. "The shape of neighborhoods to come: Examining patterns of gentrification and holistic neighborhood change in Los Angeles County, 1980–2010," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 265-294, March.
    21. Miguel de Oliver, 2016. "Gentrification as the appropriation of therapeutic ‘diversity’: A model and case study of the multicultural amenity of contemporary urban renewal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1299-1316, May.
    22. Joanna Sage & Darren Smith & Philip Hubbard, 2013. "New-build Studentification: A Panacea for Balanced Communities?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(13), pages 2623-2641, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:205808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.