IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/econso/334553.html

The politicization of sectors: Industrial change and categories of development

Author

Listed:
  • Ergen, Timur

Abstract

On April 7, 2025, just five days after "Liberation Day" - the announcement of across-the-board US tariff hikes sending shockwaves through financial markets - Steve Miran made some much-cited remarks at the Hudson Institute. The second Trump administration's chair of the Council of Economic Advisers demanded large-scale reparations from the United States' trading partners - not for war, but for relying on US hegemony, and in particular on the international system of military hegemony and dollar reserve currency provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Ergen, Timur, 2025. "The politicization of sectors: Industrial change and categories of development," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 27(1), pages 26-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:334553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334553/1/1947624245.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Wolfe, 1955. "The Concept of Economic Sectors," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(3), pages 402-420.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreja Benkovic & Juan Felipe Mejía, 2008. "Tourism as a driver of economic development: The Colombian experience," Documentos de Trabajo de Valor Público 10630, Universidad EAFIT.
    2. Yahya Z. ALSHEHHI & Jozsef POPP, 2017. "Sectoral Analysis: Growth Accounting Of Tertiary Industries," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 14, pages 221-230, August.
    3. Jens J. Krüger, 2008. "Productivity And Structural Change: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 330-363, April.
    4. Derek Baker & Kanar Dizyee & Warren Parker & Frank Scrimgeour & Garry Griffith, 2017. "Primary Industry Chains and Networks: Analysis for Public and Private Interests," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 699-709, November.
    5. Dietrich, Andreas & Krüger, Jens J., 2010. "Long-run sectoral development: Time-series evidence for the German economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 111-122, May.
    6. Mungase, Sachin & Nikam, Supriya & Kothe, Satyanarayan, 2024. "Structural Change and Labour Productivity in BRICS," MPRA Paper 121607, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. repec:got:cegedp:101 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Ietto-Gillies, Grazia & Trentini, Claudia, 2023. "Sectoral structure and the digital era. Conceptual and empirical analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 13-24.
    9. Mihnenoka Aleksandra & Senfelde Maija, 2017. "the impact of national economy structural transformation on regional employment and income: the case of Latvia," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 47-60, December.
    10. Mayntz, Renate, 2007. "The architecture of multi-level governance of economic sectors," MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/13, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Andreas Dietrich, 2012. "Does growth cause structural change, or is it the other way around? A dynamic panel data analysis for seven OECD countries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 915-944, December.
    12. Agnieszka Gehringer, 2011. "Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities across European Countries—Are there Leading Sectors?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 415-436.
    13. Małgorzata Kołodziejczak, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Servitization in European Union Countries Using Hellwig’s Synthetic Measure of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:334553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.