IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v19y2015i04ns1363919615500450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding The Way To Ambidexterity: Exploring The Relationships Among Organisational Design, Knowledge Creation And Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • ANTONELLA MARTINI

    (University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)

  • PAOLO NEIROTTI

    (Polythecnic of Torino, Italy)

  • DAVIDE ALOINI

    (University of Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

Research suggests the firm's structural and contextual attributes that foster ambidexterity, but theory and testing on their combined effects on knowledge creation, ambidexterity and financial performance remain rather poor. By using a theoretical perspectives built on organisation design and the knowledge-based view of the firm, this article takes into consideration firms' exploration attainments and exploitation initiatives in relation to both their ability to create knowledge in innovation processes and their capacity to apply it into product innovation. Using data from a survey on 112 hi-tech firms in Italy, results show that organisational context attributes influence firm's degree of ambidexterity in knowledge creation in the innovation processes, but it does not have a direct influence on the actual degree of ambidexterity in innovation development. A fundamental condition to ambidexterity in innovation development is the structural separation of exploration and exploitation innovation initiatives. Specifically, we found that structural separation of these initiatives within the organisation directly affects ambidexterity and leads to higher sales growth than when firms achieve ambidexterity through an appropriate organisational context solely. These findings provide a rich explanation of the way firms develop ambidexterity and can obtain superior economic performance from it.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Martini & Paolo Neirotti & Davide Aloini, 2015. "Finding The Way To Ambidexterity: Exploring The Relationships Among Organisational Design, Knowledge Creation And Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:19:y:2015:i:04:n:s1363919615500450
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919615500450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919615500450
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919615500450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jensen, Are & Clausen, Tommy H., 2017. "Origins and emergence of exploration and exploitation capabilities in new technology-based firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 163-175.
    2. Ana María Serrano-Bedia & Marta Pérez-Pérez, 2021. "Knowledge Ambidexterity within a Business Context: Taking Stock and Moving Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. John Bessant & Howard Rush & Anna Trifilova, 2015. "Crisis-Driven Innovation: The Case Of Humanitarian Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Olga Kassotaki, 2022. "Review of Organizational Ambidexterity Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    5. Úbeda-García, Mercedes & Claver-Cortés, Enrique & Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé & Zaragoza-Sáez, Patrocinio, 2020. "Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 363-372.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:19:y:2015:i:04:n:s1363919615500450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.