IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v184y2021i1p33-56.html

Quo Vadis Cooperation Between China and Eastern Europe in the Era of COVID‐19?

Author

Listed:
  • Emilian Kavalski

Abstract

The countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) used to be quite buoyant about benefiting from China's economic largesse. A little over a year ago, China's cooperation with the region was brandished as a real feather in China's foreign policy cap. Today, however, the China‐CEE cooperation appears to be done with. This development has led many to question whether the China‐CEE cooperation has become a victim of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The answer provided here is: no, not at all! Most CEE states have been mulling a freeze in their participation for quite some time. In this respect, the pandemic has only accelerated the social distancing of CEE countries from China. The study suggests that the unrequited romance of China with the CEE region has important implications both for the country's public diplomacy and the post‐pandemic trajectories of the Belt and Road Initiative. Los países de Europa Central y Oriental (ECO) solían ser bastante optimistas para beneficiarse de la generosidad económica de China. Hace poco más de un año, la cooperación de China con la región se blandió como una verdadera pluma en el límite de la política exterior de China. Hoy, sin embargo, la cooperación China‐ECO parece haber terminado. Este desarrollo ha llevado a muchos a cuestionar si la cooperación China‐ECO se ha convertido en una víctima de la pandemia de COVID‐19. La respuesta proporcionada por este artículo es: ¡no, en absoluto! La mayoría de los estados de Europa central y oriental han estado pensando en congelar su participación durante bastante tiempo. En este sentido, la pandemia solo ha acelerado el distanciamiento social de los países de Europa central y oriental de China. El estudio sugiere que el romance no correspondido de China con la región de ECO tiene importantes implicaciones tanto para la diplomacia pública del país como para las trayectorias posteriores a la pandemia de la Iniciativa de la Franja y la Ruta. 中歐和東歐國家 (CEE) 過去一直很樂於受益於中國的經濟大手筆。一年多以前,中國與該地區的合作被視為中國外交政策上限的真正羽毛。但是,今天看來,中歐合作已經完成。這一發展使許多人懷疑中歐合作是否已經成為COVID‐19大流行的受害者?本文提供的答案是:不,完全沒有!大多數中歐和東歐國家一直在考慮凍結其參與時間。在這方面,大流行只會加速中歐和東歐國家與中國之間的社會距離。這項研究表明,中國與中東歐地區的無情浪漫對中國的公共外交和”一帶一路”倡議大流行後的軌跡都具有重要意義。

Suggested Citation

  • Emilian Kavalski, 2021. "Quo Vadis Cooperation Between China and Eastern Europe in the Era of COVID‐19?," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 184(1), pages 33-56, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:184:y:2021:i:1:p:33-56
    DOI: 10.1177/0043820021991116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820021991116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0043820021991116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emilian Kavalski, 2011. "From the Cold War to Global Warming: Observing Complexity in IR," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Anastas Vangeli, 2017. "China's Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 25(5), pages 101-124, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 0. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    2. Zhi Luo & Guanghua Wan & Chen Wang & Xun Zhang, 2022. "The distributive impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 586-604, July.
    3. Yan Liu & Xunpeng Shi & James Laurenceson, 2018. "Are China's Exports Crowding Out or Being Crowded Out? Evidence from Japan's Imports," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(4), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Aldis Bulis & Sajal Kabiraj & Md Nur Alam Siddik, 2018. "Economic Cooperation Between Latvia and China on the Background of Belt and Road Initiative with Focus on Cargo Potential," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 7(2), pages 80-87, June.
    5. Yang Changwei & Li Zonghao & Guo Xueyan & Yu Wenying & Jin Jing & Zhu Liang, 2019. "Application of BP Neural Network Model in Risk Evaluation of Railway Construction," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, June.
    6. Mingchun Cao & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, August.
    7. Calabrese, Linda & Cao, Yue, 2021. "Managing the Belt and Road: Agency and development in Cambodia and Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Hongjun Xiao & Junjie Cheng & Xin Wang, 2018. "Does the Belt and Road Initiative Promote Sustainable Development? Evidence from Countries along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, 2018. "Europe’s financial security and Chinese economic statecraft: the case of the Belt and Road Initiative," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 237-250, September.
    10. Yu, Shu & Qian, Xingwang & Liu, Taoxiong, 2019. "Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms' outward foreign direct investment," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    11. Emilian Kavalski, 2020. "The Unexpected Consequences of China’s Cooperation with Central and Eastern Europe," International Studies, , vol. 57(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Zhi Zheng & Zhouying Song & Qidi Ji & Wei Xiong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal evolution of production cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on the input–output technique," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1117-1136, June.
    13. Anastas Vangeli & Dragan Pavlićević, 2019. "Introduction:New perspectives on China – Central and Eastern Europe relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 361-368, December.
    14. Sidong Zhao & Yiran Yan & Jing Han, 2021. "Industrial Land Change in Chinese Silk Road Cities and Its Influence on Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-30, July.
    15. Karamoko N’da & Jiaoju Ge & Steven Ji-Fan Ren & Jia Wang, 2023. "Understanding the One Belt One Road Initiative (BRI) influence on exportations of Chinese smartphones: The moderating role of the GDP per capita," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Anastas Vangeli, 2019. "Diffusion of ideas in the era of the Belt and Road: Insights from China–CEE think tank cooperation," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 421-436, December.
    17. Grzegorz Malinowski, 2019. "China, Geopolitics and Geoeconomics. How Not to Fall into the Trap of Narration?," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 69(4), pages 495-522, December.
    18. Dylan Sutherland & John Anderson & Nicholas Bailey & Ilan Alon, 2020. "Policy, institutional fragility, and Chinese outward foreign direct investment: An empirical examination of the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(3), pages 249-272, September.
    19. Xiaohui Sun & Jianbo Gao & Bin Liu & Zhenzhen Wang, 2021. "Big Data-Based Assessment of Political Risk along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:184:y:2021:i:1:p:33-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.