IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/wirecc/v5y2014i5p639-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional inertia and climate change: a review of the new institutionalist literature

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Munck af Rosenschöld
  • Jaap G. Rozema
  • Laura Alex Frye‐Levine

Abstract

Climate scientists and policy analysts alike have repeatedly called for urgent mitigating action to avoid the most adverse effects of climate change. However, within the political arena this action is largely lacking. To understand this discrepancy, we consider the institutions in climate change policy to be of central importance. Renewed interest in institutions has been generated to a great extent by ‘new institutionalism’, a field of research combining economics, political science, and sociology, and which has become increasingly popular since the 1980s. The tendency of institutions to resist change and thereby stabilize policy can be understood by using the concept of institutional inertia. Our review of the new institutionalist literature on climate change identifies five main mechanisms that generate institutional inertia: costs, uncertainty, path dependence, power, and legitimacy. Means of addressing these mechanisms are proposed by referring to the literature on institutional entrepreneurship and institutional work. A focus on the mechanisms that generate and regenerate institutional inertia is beneficial for future research on institutions and climate change, as it can be used to study bottlenecks for action and address more clearly the urgency of necessary policy interventions. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:639–648. doi: 10.1002/wcc.292 This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Iterative Risk‐Management Policy Portfolios Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Munck af Rosenschöld & Jaap G. Rozema & Laura Alex Frye‐Levine, 2014. "Institutional inertia and climate change: a review of the new institutionalist literature," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(5), pages 639-648, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:5:y:2014:i:5:p:639-648
    DOI: 10.1002/wcc.292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.292
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/wcc.292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia Bello-Bravo & Barry Robert Pittendrigh, 2023. "Getting in the Loops: Using Adaptive Design Methods for Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Mitigation in Kenya, Nepal, and Bangladesh," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Marijn H. C. Meijers & Christin Scholz & Ragnheiður “Heather” Torfadóttir & Anke Wonneberger & Marko Markov, 2022. "Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic to combat climate change: comparing drivers of individual action in global crises," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 272-282, June.
    3. Yiru Jia & Nicky Morrison & Franziska Sielker, 2023. "Delivering common property in Chinese contractual communities: Law, power and practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(16), pages 3272-3293, December.
    4. Breuer, Anita & Leininger, Julia & Malerba, Daniele & Tosun, Jale, 2023. "Integrated policymaking: Institutional designs for implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Johan Munck af Rosenschöld & Steven A Wolf, 2017. "Toward projectified environmental governance?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 273-292, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:5:y:2014:i:5:p:639-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1757-7799 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.