IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v62y2023i1p43-78.html

Rehabilitating Locks and Dams in the Upper Mississippi Waterway Through PPP: A New Business Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshinori Suzuki

Abstract

Many supply chains rely on barge transportation along the Upper Mississippi waterway system. However, locks and dams that enable traffic flows through the waterway system are aging and causing disruptions frequently, bringing considerable financial damages to shippers. Cost of the major system rehabilitation is estimated to be over $1 billion, and the prospects for getting such a large funding from the government are bleak. Public‐private partnership (PPP) based on the conventional business model that requires collecting end‐user fees to provide revenue to the participating private firms has been proposed, but not implemented due to the regulatory barriers that forbid the collection of user fees. This study proposes a new PPP business model that does not require collecting user fees. This model seeks to attract funding from shippers in exchange for reducing their financial losses due to frequent system disruptions. We describe the model concept and examine its effectiveness by performing a series of analyses that combine analytical, econometric, and simulation techniques. Results show that the proposed model is not only viable, but also financially attractive to shippers if the invested amount is optimal, allowing them to reduce supply chain disruptions considerably while also achieving sizable investment returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshinori Suzuki, 2023. "Rehabilitating Locks and Dams in the Upper Mississippi Waterway Through PPP: A New Business Model," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(1), pages 43-78, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:62:y:2023:i:1:p:43-78
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.62.1.0043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fandel, Günter & Giese, Anke & Mohn, Brigitte, 2012. "Measuring synergy effects of a Public Social Private Partnership (PSPP) project," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 815-824.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wehrle, Rebecca & Wiens, Marcus & Schultmann, Frank, 2024. "Evaluation of the potential of infrastructure funds: The case of inland waterways in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Xiaodan Zheng & Jingfeng Yuan & Jiyue Guo & Mirosław J. Skibniewski & Sujun Zhao, 2018. "Influence of Relational Norms on User Interests in PPP Projects: Mediating Effect of Project Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Alejandro Ortega & Maria de los Angeles Baeza & Jose Manuel Vassallo, 2016. "Contractual PPPs for Transport Infrastructure in Spain: Lessons from the Economic Recession," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, March.
    4. Mingshun Zhang & Ying Cui & Erik ter Avest & Meine Pieter van Dijk, 2018. "Adoption of voluntary approach: Can voluntary approach generate collective impacts for China achieving ambitious energy efficiency targets?," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(2), pages 281-299, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:62:y:2023:i:1:p:43-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.