IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i3p4689-4701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students' Perspectives on Sustainability Competences and Pedagogical Approaches: Groupings and Interrelations Results From 17 International Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Lozano
  • Maria Barreiro‐Gen
  • Gabriela Ortiz‐Martínez
  • Alberto Mendoza
  • Jordi Segalàs
  • Sandra Caeiro
  • João Simão
  • Claudio Favi
  • Bartłomiej Gładysz
  • María Alló
  • Carmen Gago‐Cortés
  • Ubiratã Tortato
  • Ferenc Mónus
  • Janna Pietikäinen
  • Ilona Södervik
  • Rami Ratvio
  • Sevket Bostanci
  • Márta Dobróné Tóth
  • Javier Benayas
  • María Teresa Jiménez Munguía
  • Déborah Xanat Flores Cervantes
  • René Alejandro Lara Díaz
  • Nelly Ramírez Corona
  • Cheryl Desha
  • Rob Hales
  • Jennifer Boddy
  • Ilija Djekic
  • Savindi Caldera
  • Orlando Sáenz
  • Leyla Azizi
  • Remmer Sassen

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEIs) have been incorporating sustainability into their curricula, which is crucial for providing students with the skills and knowledge to help societies become more sustainable. During the last 15 years, there has been increasing research on sustainability competences and the pedagogical approaches to develop them. There have been proposals on lists of competences, pedagogical approaches, their groups and their links. However, most research has focused on the perspective of educators, with limited research from the students' perspective. This paper aims to provide the students' perspective of the groups of sustainability competences, groups of pedagogical approaches, and how these connect. A survey was developed for this purpose, which was applied to participants from 17 HEIs worldwide. The responses obtained were analysed in a five‐step process: Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, Principal Component analysis (PCA) to detect the competence and pedagogical approaches groups, correlations between the groups and regressions between the groups. The PCA analysis resulted in three competences' groups and confirmed the three pedagogical approach groups. The analyses showed differences in the competences' groups between the students' and educators' perspectives. The regression analysis groups shows how the pedagogical approach groups develop the competences' groups from the students' perspective. Developing sustainability competences requires a change in the higher educational system, where the educators' and students' perspectives need to converge so that the sustainability competence–based education model is more efficient and effective in educating the future leaders, decision‐makers, educators, management and professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro‐Gen & Gabriela Ortiz‐Martínez & Alberto Mendoza & Jordi Segalàs & Sandra Caeiro & João Simão & Claudio Favi & Bartłomiej Gładysz & María Alló & Carmen Gago‐Cortés & Ubi, 2025. "Students' Perspectives on Sustainability Competences and Pedagogical Approaches: Groupings and Interrelations Results From 17 International Case Studies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4689-4701, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4689-4701
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4689-4701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.