IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v31y2023i5p3318-3327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable development of Socotra Archipelago. Application and reflexivity

Author

Listed:
  • Nataša Slak Valek

Abstract

When talking about developing tourism in places where nature has been untouched, strong criticism has emerged, especially from naturalists, ecologists, and environmentalists. These voices advocating for ‘keeping untouched places untouched’ often reach many people, who then echo that opinion without necessarily knowing the territory's situation. This paper reflects the sustainable development theory and constitutes a reflective piece of writing about tourism development in the Socotra Archipelago, a place rich in biodiversity and human traditions, but geographically remote. Socotra Island, although relatively unknown, has received a great deal of attention from natural science researchers who have focused on understanding the many endemic species found on the island. However, information about Indigenous Socotri, their behaviors, traditions, and cultures—all components of a successful cultural tourism destination—is scarce. In this paper, the author reflects on current situation on the island and possibilities for future generations. Tourism may help create future possibilities for people from the island by considering a sustainable development theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataša Slak Valek, 2023. "Sustainable development of Socotra Archipelago. Application and reflexivity," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3318-3327, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:5:p:3318-3327
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2587
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paolo Mura, 2015. "‘To participate or not to participate?’ A reflective account," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 83-98, January.
    2. Marion Mehring & Uwe Zajonz & Diana Hummel, 2017. "Social-Ecological Dynamics of Ecosystem Services: Livelihoods and the Functional Relation between Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand—Evidence from Socotra Archipelago, Yemen and the Sahel Region, Wes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Petr Maděra & Daniel Volařík & Zdeněk Patočka & Hana Kalivodová & Josef Divín & Martin Rejžek & Jan Vybíral & Samuel Lvončík & David Jeník & Pavel Hanáček & Abdullateef Saad Amer & Petr Vahalík, 2019. "Sustainable Land Use Management Needed to Conserve the Dragon’s Blood Tree of Socotra Island, a Vulnerable Endemic Umbrella Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Kasim, Azilah & Al-Gahuri, Hussein Abdulqader, 2015. "Overcoming challenges in qualitative inquiry within a conservative society," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 124-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifi-Tehrani, Mohammad & Seyfi, Siamak & Zaman, Mustafeed, 2022. "At the intersection of tourism social entrepreneurship and empathy: Development and validation of an empathy scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 433-447.
    2. Xianghua Zhang & Lingbo Dong & Yingli Huang & Yanli Xu & Huiyan Qin & Zhenhua Qiao, 2021. "Equilibrium Relationship between Ecosystem Service Supply and Consumption Driven by Economic Development and Ecological Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Sophie Peter, 2020. "Integrating Key Insights of Sociological Risk Theory into the Ecosystem Services Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:5:p:3318-3327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.